Re: Route Reflection

Well.. My topology was to deploy a RR... and as Jack pointed out by enabling
the second command its similar to having no RR.. and as Mark said would
reflect to non-clients... But the point I am trying to check is whether we
need reflection between R3 and R4... The pdf doesn't seem to say what if
there are no routes on either of these two routers and actually do not need
a peering or pass updates.. It only says if client-to-client reflection is
disabled we need to have a full mesh?

So no matter what if the reflection is disabled and even if routes aren't
being sent across do we need a full mesh.. Or can we skip the part of having
to do peering between R3-R4.

-Hoogen

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 19:48, jack daniels <jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Router(config-router)# *no bgp client-to-client reflection *
> >
> > Disables client-to-client route reflection
> >
> >
> > what is the use of this command , this says
> >
> > Disables client-to-client route reflection
> > ......so RR acts as normal IBGP router , so its same as not configuring
> > router as RR.
>
> Not exactly. It will still reflect to non-clients, which non-RR iBGP
> wouldn't.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Dec 02 2009 - 11:59:10 ART