Re: Route Reflection

From: jack daniels <jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:18:38 +0530

Router(config-router)# *no bgp client-to-client reflection *

Disables client-to-client route reflection

what is the use of this command , this says

Disables client-to-client route reflection
......so RR acts as normal IBGP router , so its same as not configuring
router as RR.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Hoogen <hoogen82_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +--R3
> R1--R2--|
> +--R4
>
> Let's say that all these routers are in a single AS.. R1 has some BGP
> routes
> and is peering with R2.. Now R2 is a route reflector..It is peering with R3
> and R4. Now R4 and R3 do not have any BGP routes that need to be sent to
> the
> other BGP neighbors... Now if the route reflection between clients have
> been
> asked to be disabled, do we now have to have peering between R4 and R3? I
> would assume that since there is no routes that exist on either R3 or R4
> that needs to get to each other, there is no need of full mesh peering. But
> the general rule is if the reflection is suppressed I need to have a full
> mesh..
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/ip/configuration/guide/1cfbgp.html#wp1001965
>
> -Hoogen
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Dec 03 2009 - 01:18:38 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 02 2010 - 11:11:07 ART