Re: LLQ with Bandwidth MQC

From: ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:39:18 -0500

If you have configured more bandwidth than what is avail, you will see the
error message telling you that you do not have enough. You can use the
max-reserv command to alter what is available for your configuration.

The link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/command/reference/qos_m1.html#wp1039174

By default you can only configure up to 75% of the bandwidth. Use this
command when you want to configure more. In your example, 24% would still
be available for class-default, aka ... unnamed traffic that does not match
your class-maps.

The percent command will be a percentage of the available bandwidth. The
above link can also be used for looking up these commands as well.

IMO, the percentage commands are very good when you are offering a service
to another or when you want to standardize a QoS config.

For example, network management traffic will always get at least 5% of the
bandwidth or biz traffic will always get 40% of bandwidth etc ...

Some service providers might offer different service levels at different
prices. An example of these might look like:

VoIP always get 25%
Net Management always gets 5%
Ip Prec 3 might always get 30%
IP Prec 4 .... gets 15%
etc ...

If you are a service provider, you can apply these configs to any link and
maintain the same service levels regardless of the actual bandwidth of the
link. Voip will still always get 25% whether it is on a T1 or T3 ...

Does this make sense? I hope my examples are clear (many times I confuse
myself :-))

HTH,

Andrew Lee Lissitz
.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:18 AM, S Malik <ccie.09_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> ALL,
>
> if I have three classes of traffic each with 25% of minimum BW and 4th
> class
> of traffic with priority percent 25 then all I need for the service-policy
> command to go through under interface is "max-reserve bw 76%".
>
> My question is that in this case only 1% of BW will be allocated to the
> traffic which is configured for LLQ?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Nov 25 2009 - 11:39:18 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:29 ART