Re: Dual DMVPN cloud with 1 hub terminating two tunnels, equal

From: Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:14:21 +1100

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:48 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> R2 (spoke that injected some eigrp routes)
> R7 hub
> R6 spoke that I see routing table of it that gets route from spoke R2.
> I already changed bandwidth on R6 and R2 spokes. but nothing would have
> changed.
> I still have equal path in routing table.
> Cheers,

[Notwithstanding it's strange to run dual cloud on a single hub..]

OK, something odd is going on then. When you update the bandwidth or
delay values on either of R7's tunnel interfaces, is this change
reflected in the EIGRP topology table on R6? What happens if you clear
the EIGRP neighbours after changing the values? The existing
'bandwidth' values on R7 should be causing it to prefer the path via
Tun0.

On R6 or R7, a 'delay' or 'bandwidth' value change on Tun0 or Tun1
should cause the changed router to prefer the path via one tunnel over
the other. Does it?

Lastly, what device is has IP 200.0.0.2? R6 is learning 10.0.23.0/24
from it but it's not R6.

If you still haven't figured it out, post "show run int tun0", "sh run
int tun1", and "sh run | s router eigrp" from all devices. Somehow I
don't think we have the full picture.

cheers,
Dale

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Nov 25 2009 - 17:14:21 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:29 ART