v2-broadcasts are working
On the first hop router, to check my access-lists, I did a debug ip packet
101 --) 101 = access-list I used. This helped confirm that I was matching
the V2 bcasts.
.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:49 PM, <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> You got it working with rip v2?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:14:21
> To: ALL From_NJ<all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: Multicast Helper-map issue
>
> Hi Andrew, I ran it again from scratch after talking to Narbik and was able
> to get RIP working. I am not sure what I did differently this time as my
> configs look the same as from my original post with the exception of adding
> PIM sparse mode to the f0/0 interface of R2. It came up and worked right
> away so I don't really know where I went wrong the first time or if
> something was "stuck" and just needed to be reconfigured after a reboot.
> Strange that you are seeing the same problem though.
>
> You are right that TTL would be a problem if not modified although I don't
> know why R4 would send a prune as TTL should have expired before it reached
> R4. You can set the TTL on the helper-map
>
> ip multicast helper-map broadcast 224.1.1.1 100 ttl 5
>
>
> Thanks for jumping in to lend a hand!
>
> Nate
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > <Have added Narbik to the CC' line>
> >
> > I tried this again w/ RIP and cannot get it to work either. I tried a
> few
> > combinations of access-lists as well ... and it does not seem to work.
> >
> > One theory is that the RIP packets have a TTL of 1 and do not get
> processed
> > by the last hope router. When these packets are taken out of the mcast
> > stream, they are expired.
> >
> > Interesting to note, when you have a sender, it will inform the RP; looks
> > good so far. No receivers just yet though ...
> >
> > After you add the helper-map to the last hop router, the RP will show
> that
> > it has a receiver and sender. The show ip mroute command appears good.
> >
> > The last hop router must be informing the RP, and this is how the mroute
> is
> > getting populated. All is good thus far.
> >
> > The last hop router receives the traffic according to the show ip mroute
> > command on the correct interface / RFP neighbor, but sends back a prune.
> Is
> > this what you all are seeing? This kind of goes against the idea that it
> is
> > a TTL problem ...
> >
> > Narbik - Previously you added an example (a few months ago) in which you
> > showed a lab w/ RIP as the broadcast test. Any thoughts to add to this?
> In
> > my searches, it appears you sent this on May 25th. For anyone looking
> for
> > this, just search the archives for helper-map
> >
> > DNS works fine, easy to test ... RIP does not.
> >
> > Andrew Lee Lissitz
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Roy Waterman <roy.waterman_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Weird...
> >> Regards the use of ip pim sparse on R2 f0/0 that is needed for the RPF
> >> check
> >> for 10.1.12.1, and to enable the forwarding of multicast packets.
> >> You would see that if you do not enable pim on r2 f0/0 that the Incoming
> >> Interface for sh ip mroute on R2 would show as Null, whereas with the
> >> command, you will see FastEthernet0/0.
> >> Ive tested without using this command, & I was not getting the broadcast
> >> to
> >> multicast conversion.
> >> As you do not seem to be having any luck with RIP though,but DNS is
> fine,
> >> something else is clearly going on here.
> >>
> >> Perhaps some others can comment?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2009/11/22 Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com>
> >>
> >> > So with the fact that the DNS broadcast works with the multicast
> helper
> >> map
> >> > from the same source host that I am trying to get the RIPv2 broadcasts
> >> to
> >> > work, is it safe to assume that the configs are correct and there is
> >> > something else going on that is preventing R2 from converting the RIP
> >> > broadcasts to multicast?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Nice catch Roy, I'm not sure how that got in there, I just checked
> it
> >> > again
> >> > > and it is as you pointed out that it should be, 10.1.23.2 for the
> RPF
> >> on
> >> > > *,224.1.1.1.
> >> > >
> >> > > One thing of note, I am not able to see an mroute entry for
> 10.1.12.1,
> >> > > 224.1.1.1 unless I kick off a broadcasted DNS lookup on R1. Even
> >> though
> >> > the
> >> > > RIPv2 broadcasts from R1 can be seen on R2, they don't cause the
> >> creation
> >> > of
> >> > > the 10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1 S,G entries on the transit routers.
> >> > >
> >> > > The DNS broadcasts seem to work fine, I can see them on R5 as
> >> expected.
> >> > > For some reason, the RIP broadcasts do not get forwarded from R2
> >> though.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Roy Waterman <
> roy.waterman_at_gmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hi Nate
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Checking your sh ip mroute, I see a cause for concern...
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> R3(config)#do sh ip mroute 224.1.1.1
> >> > >>
> >> > >> (*, 224.1.1.1), 00:36:26/00:02:59, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: SJCL
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/1, RPF nbr *10.1.34.3*
> <--------
> >> > >> Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:36:26/00:02:02
> >> > >>
> >> > >> (10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1), 00:01:33/00:01:26, flags: LJ
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
> >> > >> Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:01:33/00:02:58
> >> > >> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:01:33/00:02:02
> >> > >>
> >> > >> RPF nbr should be 10.1.23.2
> >> > >> Can you investigate why your route to rp 2.2.2.2 has next hop as
> >> > 10.1.34.3
> >> > >> instead of 10.1.23.2?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I think your issues are being caused as a result of you using LAN
> >> > >> interfaces all the way through, and perhaps all your lan interfaces
> >> are
> >> > in
> >> > >> the same VLAN.
> >> > >> I imagine if you used point to point serial interfaces between R2 &
> >> R3,
> >> > >> and between R3 & R4, you would not see this.
> >> > >> You should be able to get this to work, just make sure your routing
> >> is
> >> > as
> >> > >> it should be.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Either this or you made a typo when posting the output into gs, and
> >> the
> >> > >> mroute output is not from R3 :)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Just so you know, I replicated your setup using point to point
> >> serials
> >> > and
> >> > >> all is well:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> In my setup:
> >> > >> *Mar 1 03:50:38.387: IP(0): s=10.1.12.1 (FastEthernet0/0)
> >> d=224.1.1.1
> >> > >> (Serial0/0.23) id=0, ttl=4, prot=17, len=52(52), mforward
> >> > >> R2(config)#
> >> > >>
> >> > >> R5(config-if)#do sh ip ro rip
> >> > >> R 1.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19 --- R1s loopback
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 2009/11/21 Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks again for taking the time to have a look at this. Other
> than
> >> > >>> Groupstudy, there isn't a very large pool of people you can ask
> for
> >> > help on
> >> > >>> some of the CCIE lab topics without watching the other person's
> eyes
> >> > glaze
> >> > >>> over :)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Roy - I was under the impression that I would not need PIM enabled
> >> on
> >> > the
> >> > >>> fa0/0 of R2. Is that incorrect? I tried enabling it, but was
> still
> >> > unable
> >> > >>> to pass the traffic.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Andrew - I gave it a run with DNS and could not get it working
> >> either,
> >> > I
> >> > >>> added udp 53 to the ip forward-protocol as well as to my ACLs but
> >> > wasn't
> >> > >>> able to see it on the other side or able to see it leave R2 as a
> >> > multicast
> >> > >>> for that matter. One thing I noticed is that even after typing in
> >> ip
> >> > >>> forward-protocol 53 or ip forward-protocol domain that it does not
> >> show
> >> > up
> >> > >>> in the config. Is this a default setting?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I took a look at my mroute statements as well, and the entries are
> >> > there,
> >> > >>> however R3 and R4 have Null incoming interfaces for the 10.1.12.1,
> >> > 224.1.1.1
> >> > >>> entry. I am assuming that this is because they never receive an
> >> > incoming
> >> > >>> packet from a source for group 224.1.1.1?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Here are the Mroutes:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> R2(config)#do sh ip mroute 224.1.1.1
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> (*, 224.1.1.1), 00:34:35/00:03:20, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: S
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
> >> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >>> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:34:35/00:03:20
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> (10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1), 00:13:16/00:03:24, flags: T
> >> > >>> Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/0, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
> >> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >>> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:13:16/00:03:20
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> R3(config)#do sh ip mroute 224.1.1.1
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> (*, 224.1.1.1), 00:36:26/00:02:59, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: SJCL
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/1, RPF nbr 10.1.34.3
> >> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >>> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:36:26/00:02:02
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> (10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1), 00:01:33/00:01:26, flags: LJ
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
> >> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >>> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:01:33/00:02:58
> >> > >>> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:01:33/00:02:02
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> R4(config)#do sh ip mroute
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> (*, 224.1.1.1), 00:28:06/00:02:59, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: SJCL
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/1, RPF nbr 10.1.34.3
> >> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >>> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:28:06/00:02:20
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> (10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1), 00:02:19/00:00:40, flags: LJ
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
> >> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >>> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:02:19/00:02:26
> >> > >>> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:02:19/00:02:20
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Here is my configs from R2, R3 and R4
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> R2:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> interface Loopback0
> >> > >>> ip address 2.2.2.2 255.0.0.0
> >> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/0
> >> > >>> ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>> ip multicast helper-map broadcast 224.1.1.1 100 ttl 5
> >> > >>> duplex auto
> >> > >>> speed auto
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/1
> >> > >>> ip address 10.1.23.2 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>> duplex auto
> >> > >>> speed auto
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> router ospf 100
> >> > >>> log-adjacency-changes
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >> > >>> network 10.1.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> ip forward-protocol nd
> >> > >>> ip forward-protocol udp rip
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> ip http server
> >> > >>> no ip http secure-server
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> ip pim bsr-candidate Loopback0 0
> >> > >>> ip pim rp-candidate Loopback0
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> access-list 100 permit udp any any eq rip
> >> > >>> access-list 100 permit udp any any eq domain
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> R3:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> interface Loopback0
> >> > >>> ip address 3.3.3.3 255.0.0.0
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/0
> >> > >>> ip address 10.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>> duplex auto
> >> > >>> speed auto
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/1
> >> > >>> ip address 10.1.34.3 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>> duplex auto
> >> > >>> speed auto
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> router ospf 100
> >> > >>> log-adjacency-changes
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> R4:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> interface Loopback0
> >> > >>> ip address 4.4.4.4 255.0.0.0
> >> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/0
> >> > >>> ip address 10.1.45.4 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>> ip directed-broadcast
> >> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>> duplex auto
> >> > >>> speed auto
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/1
> >> > >>> ip address 10.1.34.4 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>> ip multicast helper-map 224.1.1.1 10.1.45.255 100
> >> > >>> duplex auto
> >> > >>> speed auto
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> router ospf 100
> >> > >>> log-adjacency-changes
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> network 4.4.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >> > >>> network 10.1.34.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> ip forward-protocol nd
> >> > >>> ip forward-protocol udp rip
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> ip http server
> >> > >>> no ip http secure-server
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> !
> >> > >>> access-list 100 permit udp any any eq rip
> >> > >>> access-list 100 permit udp any any eq domain
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, ALL From_NJ <
> >> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> I have to run out in 2 minutes, but can add more color later.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Nate - can you try this with DNS and then paste your configs if
> it
> >> > does
> >> > >>>> not work?
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> I labbed this and got DNS lookups to work fairly easily, but did
> >> not
> >> > get
> >> > >>>> RIP to be forwarded. I need a little more time to look at RIP,
> >> > however dns
> >> > >>>> bcasts on one side are forwarded across to the other ... I am
> >> trying
> >> > to
> >> > >>>> squeeze this lab test in between a mountain of other end of week
> >> > tasks. ;-)
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Not to be silly with this next suggestion Nate, however ... when
> >> > >>>> forwarding the DNS, make sure that the correct port numbers are
> >> > specified in
> >> > >>>> the forward-protocol command and the access-list. I originally
> >> copied
> >> > and
> >> > >>>> pasted the command reference into notepad and forgot to change
> >> these.
> >> > Oh
> >> > >>>> well ... trying to be too quick.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Also, a pretty cool thing to do across the network before and
> >> during
> >> > the
> >> > >>>> test is the show ip mroute command. You will see incoming and
> >> > outgoing
> >> > >>>> interfaces added accordingly. Keep it nerdy!
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Team ---> TGIF!
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Chat soon,
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Andrew
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Roy Waterman <
> >> roy.waterman_at_gmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>> Hi Nate
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> It looks like you are missing:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> *ip pim sparse-mode* on R2 f0/0.
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> This command does show on the config guide.
> >> > >>>>> With all the commands needed for mcast helper map, it is so easy
> >> to
> >> > >>>>> miss the
> >> > >>>>> odd command.
> >> > >>>>> Other than that, your config looks great to me.
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Give that a go and let us know if that resolves matters.
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Regards
> >> > >>>>> Roy
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> 2009/11/14 Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> > I am having an issue getting the ip helper-map to work and
> after
> >> > >>>>> going over
> >> > >>>>> > my configs 3 or 4 times am still not sure what the problem is.
> >> Any
> >> > >>>>> hints
> >> > >>>>> > or
> >> > >>>>> > pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
> I
> >> am
> >> > >>>>> trying
> >> > >>>>> > to get one router to send a RIPv2 broadcast which should be
> >> picked
> >> > up
> >> > >>>>> by
> >> > >>>>> > another router, translated using the multicast helper-map to
> >> > >>>>> 224.1.1.1 and
> >> > >>>>> > then sent across an OSPF domain where it is converted back to
> a
> >> > >>>>> broadcast
> >> > >>>>> > at
> >> > >>>>> > the other side and received by another RIP router.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > *The setup:*
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > I have 5 routers setup in a straight line R1 <> R2 <> R3 <> R4
> >> <>
> >> > R5.
> >> > >>>>> > Multicast routing is enabled on R2, R3 and R4.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R2, R3 and R4 are all running PIM sparse mode on their
> loopbacks
> >> > and
> >> > >>>>> their
> >> > >>>>> > interfaces facing each other.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R1 and R5 are speaking RIPv2 and R2, R3 and R4 are using OSPF.
> >> I
> >> > am
> >> > >>>>> trying
> >> > >>>>> > to get R5 to receive RIP routes from R1.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R1 has the v2-broadcast turned on on its interface facing R2.
> >> R2
> >> > is
> >> > >>>>> able
> >> > >>>>> > to
> >> > >>>>> > see these broadcasts with a packet debug.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R2 is the BSR and RP for the three routers running OSPF,
> >> multicast
> >> > >>>>> routing
> >> > >>>>> > is not enabled on R1 or R5.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > The helper map is configured on R2's interface fa0/0 which is
> >> > facing
> >> > >>>>> R1 and
> >> > >>>>> > should take RIP broadcasts and convert them to the 224.1.1.1
> >> group.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > There is another helper-map on R4's fa0/1 interface which
> faces
> >> R3
> >> > >>>>> and is
> >> > >>>>> > configured to receive the 224.1.1.1 group and send a broadcast
> >> to
> >> > >>>>> > 10.1.45.255.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > IP Directed-broadcast is enabled on R4's fa0/0 interface
> facing
> >> R5.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R5 is configured with no validate-update-source to prevent it
> >> from
> >> > >>>>> dropping
> >> > >>>>> > any packets that appear from R1's 10.1.12.1 address.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > *The problem:*
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > When I debug IP mpacket and debug IP packet on R2, I am able
> to
> >> see
> >> > >>>>> the RIP
> >> > >>>>> > broadcasts from R1, but it appears that they are never sent
> out
> >> as
> >> > >>>>> the
> >> > >>>>> > 224.1.1.1 multicast address
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R5 never receives any packets from R1, a debug IP mpacket on
> R2
> >> R3
> >> > >>>>> and R4
> >> > >>>>> > show no packets to 224.1.1.1 ever being sent anywhere.
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > *The configs:
> >> > >>>>> > *
> >> > >>>>> > R1:
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> >> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>>>> > ip rip v2-broadcast
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > router rip
> >> > >>>>> > version 2
> >> > >>>>> > network 1.0.0.0
> >> > >>>>> > network 10.0.0.0
> >> > >>>>> > no auto-summary
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R2:
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> >> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>>>> > ip multicast helper-map broadcast 224.1.1.1 100 ttl 4
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/1
> >> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.23.2 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>>>> > ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > router ospf 100
> >> > >>>>> > network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >> > >>>>> > network 10.1.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > ip forward-protocol udp rip
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > ip pim bsr-candidate Loopback0 0
> >> > >>>>> > ip pim rp-candidate Loopback0
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > access-list 100 permit udp any any eq rip
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R3:
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> >> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>>>> > ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/1
> >> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.34.3 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>>>> > ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > router ospf 100
> >> > >>>>> > network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R4:
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> >> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.45.4 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>>>> > ip directed-broadcast
> >> > >>>>> > ip igmp join-group 224.1.1.1
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/1
> >> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.34.4 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>>>> > ip pim sparse-mode
> >> > >>>>> > ip multicast helper-map 224.1.1.1 10.1.45.255 100
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > router ospf 100
> >> > >>>>> > network 4.4.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >> > >>>>> > network 10.1.34.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > ip forward-protocol nd
> >> > >>>>> > ip forward-protocol udp rip
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R5:
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> >> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.45.5 255.255.255.0
> >> > >>>>> > !
> >> > >>>>> > router rip
> >> > >>>>> > version 2
> >> > >>>>> > no validate-update-source
> >> > >>>>> > network 10.0.0.0
> >> > >>>>> > no auto-summary
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > *The shows and debugs:
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > *
> >> > >>>>> > From R2 with debug ip packet and mpacket enabled, notice no
> >> packets
> >> > >>>>> to
> >> > >>>>> > 224.1.1.1 are ever sent:
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > *Mar 1 01:29:53.599: IP: s=10.1.12.1 (FastEthernet0/0),
> >> > >>>>> d=255.255.255.255,
> >> > >>>>> > len 52, rcvd 2
> >> > >>>>> > *Mar 1 01:29:53.603: UDP src=520, dst=520
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > From R4:
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R4(config-if)#*do sh ip mroute*
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > IP Multicast Routing Table
> >> > >>>>> > <output omitted>
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > (*, 224.1.1.1), 01:21:43/00:02:57, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: SJCL
> >> > >>>>> > Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/1, RPF nbr 10.1.34.3
> >> > >>>>> > Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >>>>> > FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:41:58/00:02:54
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > (*, 224.0.1.40), 01:24:27/00:02:52, RP 0.0.0.0, flags: DCL
> >> > >>>>> > Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
> >> > >>>>> > Outgoing interface list:
> >> > >>>>> > Loopback0, Forward/Sparse, 01:24:27/00:02:52
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > R4(config-if)#*do sh ip pim rp map 224.1.1.1*
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > Group(s) 224.0.0.0/4
> >> > >>>>> > RP 2.2.2.2 (?), v2
> >> > >>>>> > Info source: 2.2.2.2 (?), via bootstrap, priority 0,
> holdtime
> >> > 150
> >> > >>>>> > Uptime: 01:24:07, expires: 00:01:48
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>>
> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> > >>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > >>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>> >
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> --
> >> > >>>>> Regards
> >> > >>>>> Roy
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> > >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> --
> >> > >>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> >> > >>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Regards
> >> > >> Roy
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >
> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards
> >> Roy
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Lee Lissitz
> > all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Andrew Lee Lissitz all.from.nj_at_gmail.com Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Nov 23 2009 - 22:54:09 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:29 ART