Re: Multicast Helper-map issue

From: ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:49:32 -0500

Alrighty then ... I will try once again ;-(

.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew, I ran it again from scratch after talking to Narbik and was able
> to get RIP working. I am not sure what I did differently this time as my
> configs look the same as from my original post with the exception of adding
> PIM sparse mode to the f0/0 interface of R2. It came up and worked right
> away so I don't really know where I went wrong the first time or if
> something was "stuck" and just needed to be reconfigured after a reboot.
> Strange that you are seeing the same problem though.
>
> You are right that TTL would be a problem if not modified although I don't
> know why R4 would send a prune as TTL should have expired before it reached
> R4. You can set the TTL on the helper-map
>
>
> ip multicast helper-map broadcast 224.1.1.1 100 ttl 5
>
>
> Thanks for jumping in to lend a hand!
>
> Nate
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> <Have added Narbik to the CC' line>
>>
>> I tried this again w/ RIP and cannot get it to work either. I tried a few
>> combinations of access-lists as well ... and it does not seem to work.
>>
>> One theory is that the RIP packets have a TTL of 1 and do not get
>> processed by the last hope router. When these packets are taken out of the
>> mcast stream, they are expired.
>>
>> Interesting to note, when you have a sender, it will inform the RP; looks
>> good so far. No receivers just yet though ...
>>
>> After you add the helper-map to the last hop router, the RP will show that
>> it has a receiver and sender. The show ip mroute command appears good.
>>
>> The last hop router must be informing the RP, and this is how the mroute
>> is getting populated. All is good thus far.
>>
>> The last hop router receives the traffic according to the show ip mroute
>> command on the correct interface / RFP neighbor, but sends back a prune. Is
>> this what you all are seeing? This kind of goes against the idea that it is
>> a TTL problem ...
>>
>> Narbik - Previously you added an example (a few months ago) in which you
>> showed a lab w/ RIP as the broadcast test. Any thoughts to add to this? In
>> my searches, it appears you sent this on May 25th. For anyone looking for
>> this, just search the archives for helper-map
>>
>> DNS works fine, easy to test ... RIP does not.
>>
>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Roy Waterman <roy.waterman_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Weird...
>>> Regards the use of ip pim sparse on R2 f0/0 that is needed for the RPF
>>> check
>>> for 10.1.12.1, and to enable the forwarding of multicast packets.
>>> You would see that if you do not enable pim on r2 f0/0 that the Incoming
>>> Interface for sh ip mroute on R2 would show as Null, whereas with the
>>> command, you will see FastEthernet0/0.
>>> Ive tested without using this command, & I was not getting the broadcast
>>> to
>>> multicast conversion.
>>> As you do not seem to be having any luck with RIP though,but DNS is fine,
>>> something else is clearly going on here.
>>>
>>> Perhaps some others can comment?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/11/22 Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com>
>>>
>>> > So with the fact that the DNS broadcast works with the multicast helper
>>> map
>>> > from the same source host that I am trying to get the RIPv2 broadcasts
>>> to
>>> > work, is it safe to assume that the configs are correct and there is
>>> > something else going on that is preventing R2 from converting the RIP
>>> > broadcasts to multicast?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Nice catch Roy, I'm not sure how that got in there, I just checked it
>>> > again
>>> > > and it is as you pointed out that it should be, 10.1.23.2 for the RPF
>>> on
>>> > > *,224.1.1.1.
>>> > >
>>> > > One thing of note, I am not able to see an mroute entry for
>>> 10.1.12.1,
>>> > > 224.1.1.1 unless I kick off a broadcasted DNS lookup on R1. Even
>>> though
>>> > the
>>> > > RIPv2 broadcasts from R1 can be seen on R2, they don't cause the
>>> creation
>>> > of
>>> > > the 10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1 S,G entries on the transit routers.
>>> > >
>>> > > The DNS broadcasts seem to work fine, I can see them on R5 as
>>> expected.
>>> > > For some reason, the RIP broadcasts do not get forwarded from R2
>>> though.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Roy Waterman <
>>> roy.waterman_at_gmail.com
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi Nate
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Checking your sh ip mroute, I see a cause for concern...
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> R3(config)#do sh ip mroute 224.1.1.1
>>> > >>
>>> > >> (*, 224.1.1.1), 00:36:26/00:02:59, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: SJCL
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/1, RPF nbr *10.1.34.3* <--------
>>> > >> Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:36:26/00:02:02
>>> > >>
>>> > >> (10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1), 00:01:33/00:01:26, flags: LJ
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
>>> > >> Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:01:33/00:02:58
>>> > >> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:01:33/00:02:02
>>> > >>
>>> > >> RPF nbr should be 10.1.23.2
>>> > >> Can you investigate why your route to rp 2.2.2.2 has next hop as
>>> > 10.1.34.3
>>> > >> instead of 10.1.23.2?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I think your issues are being caused as a result of you using LAN
>>> > >> interfaces all the way through, and perhaps all your lan interfaces
>>> are
>>> > in
>>> > >> the same VLAN.
>>> > >> I imagine if you used point to point serial interfaces between R2 &
>>> R3,
>>> > >> and between R3 & R4, you would not see this.
>>> > >> You should be able to get this to work, just make sure your routing
>>> is
>>> > as
>>> > >> it should be.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Either this or you made a typo when posting the output into gs, and
>>> the
>>> > >> mroute output is not from R3 :)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Just so you know, I replicated your setup using point to point
>>> serials
>>> > and
>>> > >> all is well:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> In my setup:
>>> > >> *Mar 1 03:50:38.387: IP(0): s=10.1.12.1 (FastEthernet0/0)
>>> d=224.1.1.1
>>> > >> (Serial0/0.23) id=0, ttl=4, prot=17, len=52(52), mforward
>>> > >> R2(config)#
>>> > >>
>>> > >> R5(config-if)#do sh ip ro rip
>>> > >> R 1.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19 --- R1s loopback
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> 2009/11/21 Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks again for taking the time to have a look at this. Other than
>>> > >>> Groupstudy, there isn't a very large pool of people you can ask for
>>> > help on
>>> > >>> some of the CCIE lab topics without watching the other person's
>>> eyes
>>> > glaze
>>> > >>> over :)
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Roy - I was under the impression that I would not need PIM enabled
>>> on
>>> > the
>>> > >>> fa0/0 of R2. Is that incorrect? I tried enabling it, but was
>>> still
>>> > unable
>>> > >>> to pass the traffic.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Andrew - I gave it a run with DNS and could not get it working
>>> either,
>>> > I
>>> > >>> added udp 53 to the ip forward-protocol as well as to my ACLs but
>>> > wasn't
>>> > >>> able to see it on the other side or able to see it leave R2 as a
>>> > multicast
>>> > >>> for that matter. One thing I noticed is that even after typing in
>>> ip
>>> > >>> forward-protocol 53 or ip forward-protocol domain that it does not
>>> show
>>> > up
>>> > >>> in the config. Is this a default setting?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I took a look at my mroute statements as well, and the entries are
>>> > there,
>>> > >>> however R3 and R4 have Null incoming interfaces for the 10.1.12.1,
>>> > 224.1.1.1
>>> > >>> entry. I am assuming that this is because they never receive an
>>> > incoming
>>> > >>> packet from a source for group 224.1.1.1?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Here are the Mroutes:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> R2(config)#do sh ip mroute 224.1.1.1
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (*, 224.1.1.1), 00:34:35/00:03:20, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: S
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
>>> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >>> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:34:35/00:03:20
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1), 00:13:16/00:03:24, flags: T
>>> > >>> Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/0, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
>>> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >>> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:13:16/00:03:20
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> R3(config)#do sh ip mroute 224.1.1.1
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (*, 224.1.1.1), 00:36:26/00:02:59, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: SJCL
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/1, RPF nbr 10.1.34.3
>>> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >>> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:36:26/00:02:02
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1), 00:01:33/00:01:26, flags: LJ
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
>>> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >>> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:01:33/00:02:58
>>> > >>> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:01:33/00:02:02
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> R4(config)#do sh ip mroute
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (*, 224.1.1.1), 00:28:06/00:02:59, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: SJCL
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/1, RPF nbr 10.1.34.3
>>> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >>> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:28:06/00:02:20
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (10.1.12.1, 224.1.1.1), 00:02:19/00:00:40, flags: LJ
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
>>> > >>> Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >>> FastEthernet0/1, Forward/Sparse, 00:02:19/00:02:26
>>> > >>> FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:02:19/00:02:20
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Here is my configs from R2, R3 and R4
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> R2:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> interface Loopback0
>>> > >>> ip address 2.2.2.2 255.0.0.0
>>> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> > >>> ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>> ip multicast helper-map broadcast 224.1.1.1 100 ttl 5
>>> > >>> duplex auto
>>> > >>> speed auto
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>>> > >>> ip address 10.1.23.2 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>> duplex auto
>>> > >>> speed auto
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> router ospf 100
>>> > >>> log-adjacency-changes
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> > >>> network 10.1.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> ip forward-protocol nd
>>> > >>> ip forward-protocol udp rip
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> ip http server
>>> > >>> no ip http secure-server
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> ip pim bsr-candidate Loopback0 0
>>> > >>> ip pim rp-candidate Loopback0
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> access-list 100 permit udp any any eq rip
>>> > >>> access-list 100 permit udp any any eq domain
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> R3:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> interface Loopback0
>>> > >>> ip address 3.3.3.3 255.0.0.0
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> > >>> ip address 10.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>> duplex auto
>>> > >>> speed auto
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>>> > >>> ip address 10.1.34.3 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>> duplex auto
>>> > >>> speed auto
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> router ospf 100
>>> > >>> log-adjacency-changes
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> R4:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> interface Loopback0
>>> > >>> ip address 4.4.4.4 255.0.0.0
>>> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> > >>> ip address 10.1.45.4 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>> ip directed-broadcast
>>> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>> duplex auto
>>> > >>> speed auto
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>>> > >>> ip address 10.1.34.4 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>> ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>> ip multicast helper-map 224.1.1.1 10.1.45.255 100
>>> > >>> duplex auto
>>> > >>> speed auto
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> router ospf 100
>>> > >>> log-adjacency-changes
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> network 4.4.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> > >>> network 10.1.34.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> ip forward-protocol nd
>>> > >>> ip forward-protocol udp rip
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> ip http server
>>> > >>> no ip http secure-server
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> !
>>> > >>> access-list 100 permit udp any any eq rip
>>> > >>> access-list 100 permit udp any any eq domain
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, ALL From_NJ <
>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> I have to run out in 2 minutes, but can add more color later.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Nate - can you try this with DNS and then paste your configs if it
>>> > does
>>> > >>>> not work?
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> I labbed this and got DNS lookups to work fairly easily, but did
>>> not
>>> > get
>>> > >>>> RIP to be forwarded. I need a little more time to look at RIP,
>>> > however dns
>>> > >>>> bcasts on one side are forwarded across to the other ... I am
>>> trying
>>> > to
>>> > >>>> squeeze this lab test in between a mountain of other end of week
>>> > tasks. ;-)
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Not to be silly with this next suggestion Nate, however ... when
>>> > >>>> forwarding the DNS, make sure that the correct port numbers are
>>> > specified in
>>> > >>>> the forward-protocol command and the access-list. I originally
>>> copied
>>> > and
>>> > >>>> pasted the command reference into notepad and forgot to change
>>> these.
>>> > Oh
>>> > >>>> well ... trying to be too quick.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Also, a pretty cool thing to do across the network before and
>>> during
>>> > the
>>> > >>>> test is the show ip mroute command. You will see incoming and
>>> > outgoing
>>> > >>>> interfaces added accordingly. Keep it nerdy!
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Team ---> TGIF!
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Chat soon,
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Andrew
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Roy Waterman <
>>> roy.waterman_at_gmail.com
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>> Hi Nate
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> It looks like you are missing:
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> *ip pim sparse-mode* on R2 f0/0.
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> This command does show on the config guide.
>>> > >>>>> With all the commands needed for mcast helper map, it is so easy
>>> to
>>> > >>>>> miss the
>>> > >>>>> odd command.
>>> > >>>>> Other than that, your config looks great to me.
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Give that a go and let us know if that resolves matters.
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Regards
>>> > >>>>> Roy
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> 2009/11/14 Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> > I am having an issue getting the ip helper-map to work and
>>> after
>>> > >>>>> going over
>>> > >>>>> > my configs 3 or 4 times am still not sure what the problem is.
>>> Any
>>> > >>>>> hints
>>> > >>>>> > or
>>> > >>>>> > pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
>>> I am
>>> > >>>>> trying
>>> > >>>>> > to get one router to send a RIPv2 broadcast which should be
>>> picked
>>> > up
>>> > >>>>> by
>>> > >>>>> > another router, translated using the multicast helper-map to
>>> > >>>>> 224.1.1.1 and
>>> > >>>>> > then sent across an OSPF domain where it is converted back to a
>>> > >>>>> broadcast
>>> > >>>>> > at
>>> > >>>>> > the other side and received by another RIP router.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > *The setup:*
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > I have 5 routers setup in a straight line R1 <> R2 <> R3 <> R4
>>> <>
>>> > R5.
>>> > >>>>> > Multicast routing is enabled on R2, R3 and R4.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R2, R3 and R4 are all running PIM sparse mode on their
>>> loopbacks
>>> > and
>>> > >>>>> their
>>> > >>>>> > interfaces facing each other.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R1 and R5 are speaking RIPv2 and R2, R3 and R4 are using OSPF.
>>> I
>>> > am
>>> > >>>>> trying
>>> > >>>>> > to get R5 to receive RIP routes from R1.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R1 has the v2-broadcast turned on on its interface facing R2.
>>> R2
>>> > is
>>> > >>>>> able
>>> > >>>>> > to
>>> > >>>>> > see these broadcasts with a packet debug.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R2 is the BSR and RP for the three routers running OSPF,
>>> multicast
>>> > >>>>> routing
>>> > >>>>> > is not enabled on R1 or R5.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > The helper map is configured on R2's interface fa0/0 which is
>>> > facing
>>> > >>>>> R1 and
>>> > >>>>> > should take RIP broadcasts and convert them to the 224.1.1.1
>>> group.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > There is another helper-map on R4's fa0/1 interface which faces
>>> R3
>>> > >>>>> and is
>>> > >>>>> > configured to receive the 224.1.1.1 group and send a broadcast
>>> to
>>> > >>>>> > 10.1.45.255.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > IP Directed-broadcast is enabled on R4's fa0/0 interface facing
>>> R5.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R5 is configured with no validate-update-source to prevent it
>>> from
>>> > >>>>> dropping
>>> > >>>>> > any packets that appear from R1's 10.1.12.1 address.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > *The problem:*
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > When I debug IP mpacket and debug IP packet on R2, I am able to
>>> see
>>> > >>>>> the RIP
>>> > >>>>> > broadcasts from R1, but it appears that they are never sent out
>>> as
>>> > >>>>> the
>>> > >>>>> > 224.1.1.1 multicast address
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R5 never receives any packets from R1, a debug IP mpacket on R2
>>> R3
>>> > >>>>> and R4
>>> > >>>>> > show no packets to 224.1.1.1 ever being sent anywhere.
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > *The configs:
>>> > >>>>> > *
>>> > >>>>> > R1:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>>>> > ip rip v2-broadcast
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > router rip
>>> > >>>>> > version 2
>>> > >>>>> > network 1.0.0.0
>>> > >>>>> > network 10.0.0.0
>>> > >>>>> > no auto-summary
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R2:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>>>> > ip multicast helper-map broadcast 224.1.1.1 100 ttl 4
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/1
>>> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.23.2 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>>>> > ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > router ospf 100
>>> > >>>>> > network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> > >>>>> > network 10.1.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > ip forward-protocol udp rip
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > ip pim bsr-candidate Loopback0 0
>>> > >>>>> > ip pim rp-candidate Loopback0
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > access-list 100 permit udp any any eq rip
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R3:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>>>> > ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/1
>>> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.34.3 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>>>> > ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > router ospf 100
>>> > >>>>> > network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R4:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.45.4 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>>>> > ip directed-broadcast
>>> > >>>>> > ip igmp join-group 224.1.1.1
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/1
>>> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.34.4 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>>>> > ip pim sparse-mode
>>> > >>>>> > ip multicast helper-map 224.1.1.1 10.1.45.255 100
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > router ospf 100
>>> > >>>>> > network 4.4.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> > >>>>> > network 10.1.34.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > ip forward-protocol nd
>>> > >>>>> > ip forward-protocol udp rip
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R5:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> > >>>>> > ip address 10.1.45.5 255.255.255.0
>>> > >>>>> > !
>>> > >>>>> > router rip
>>> > >>>>> > version 2
>>> > >>>>> > no validate-update-source
>>> > >>>>> > network 10.0.0.0
>>> > >>>>> > no auto-summary
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > *The shows and debugs:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > *
>>> > >>>>> > From R2 with debug ip packet and mpacket enabled, notice no
>>> packets
>>> > >>>>> to
>>> > >>>>> > 224.1.1.1 are ever sent:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > *Mar 1 01:29:53.599: IP: s=10.1.12.1 (FastEthernet0/0),
>>> > >>>>> d=255.255.255.255,
>>> > >>>>> > len 52, rcvd 2
>>> > >>>>> > *Mar 1 01:29:53.603: UDP src=520, dst=520
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > From R4:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R4(config-if)#*do sh ip mroute*
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > IP Multicast Routing Table
>>> > >>>>> > <output omitted>
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > (*, 224.1.1.1), 01:21:43/00:02:57, RP 2.2.2.2, flags: SJCL
>>> > >>>>> > Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/1, RPF nbr 10.1.34.3
>>> > >>>>> > Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >>>>> > FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Sparse, 00:41:58/00:02:54
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > (*, 224.0.1.40), 01:24:27/00:02:52, RP 0.0.0.0, flags: DCL
>>> > >>>>> > Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
>>> > >>>>> > Outgoing interface list:
>>> > >>>>> > Loopback0, Forward/Sparse, 01:24:27/00:02:52
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > R4(config-if)#*do sh ip pim rp map 224.1.1.1*
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > Group(s) 224.0.0.0/4
>>> > >>>>> > RP 2.2.2.2 (?), v2
>>> > >>>>> > Info source: 2.2.2.2 (?), via bootstrap, priority 0,
>>> holdtime
>>> > 150
>>> > >>>>> > Uptime: 01:24:07, expires: 00:01:48
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > >>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > >>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> --
>>> > >>>>> Regards
>>> > >>>>> Roy
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> --
>>> > >>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>> > >>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Roy
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>> Roy
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Nov 23 2009 - 21:49:32 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:29 ART