Re: OSPF

no.. areaness is not a word, but neither are etherchannel, peering (as in
two routers) and pseudowire. A phrase like totally-not-so-anything would
make the average english teacher faint. Networkers are above the puny
rules of english usage! It's even voluntary for some of us :)

From:
Nate Lee <natetlee_at_gmail.com>
To:
Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com
Cc:
MDevarajan_at_inautix.co.in, ccielab_at_groupstudy.com, Dale Shaw
<dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Date:
11/22/2009 06:29 PM
Subject:
Re: OSPF

Like Keegan wrote, the next-hop in BGP is there to fulfill a different
need and is set by the router who originally advertised the route into the
AS. With OSPF on the other hand, each router has a table of all the links
in the area and then builds routes and computes next-hops based on that.
This means that any next hop for a given route would generally be set by
manipulating the values that OSPF uses to compute next hop such as cost or
intra/inter areaness (is that a word?) of the route.m

Nate

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:07 PM, <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> wrote:
I think you're getting your features crossed. The point of bgp next hop
self is that your route to the next hop may not be advertised to all of
your bgp routers since it is not meant to be part of the bgp topology.
OSPF has no such complications so most of the time the next hop problem is
based on media alone. Hence you just change the next hop value or map the
next hop to a usable layer-2 address.

From:
<MDevarajan_at_inautix.co.in>
To:
Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>
Cc:
ccielab_at_groupstudy.com, nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Date:
11/21/2009 07:08 AM
Subject:
Re: OSPF
Sent by:
<nobody_at_groupstudy.com>

yes Dale , ospf network type , ip ospf network point-to-multipoint and ip
ospf network point-to-multipoint non-broadcast will change the nexthop
address .. Apart from that is there any special command ??

Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>
Sent by: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
11/21/2009 06:02 AM
Please respond to
Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>

To
Mohan Kumar Devarajan/Chennai/iNautix_at_iNautix
cc
ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject
Re: OSPF

Hi,

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:55 PM, <MDevarajan_at_inautix.co.in> wrote:
>
> is there any confuguration for ospf to change the Next-hop,.. Like in
> Eigrp.

Play around with the various OSPF network types and see what happens.

cheers,
Dale

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Nov 22 2009 - 18:39:41 ART