Re: access-list usage

The first one is a more efficient way to do it in one line since your networks summarize nicely
------Original Message------
From: rakesh m
Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
To: CCIE Groupstudy
ReplyTo: rakesh m
Subject: Re: access-list usage
Sent: Nov 22, 2009 12:05 PM

correction the

access-list 101 permit 49.1.0.0 0.0.3.255

On 11/22/09, rakesh m <raaki.88_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> hello group i have a doubt regarding the usage of access-list
>
> i have 4 loopbacks
>
> 49.1.0.1
>
> 49.1.1.1
>
> 49.1.2.1
>
> 49.1.3.1
>
>
> now the task requires the redistribution of these networks
>
> the solution provided is something like this
>
> creation of access-list goes like this
>
> access-list 101 permit 55.1.0.0 0.0.3.255
>
> but is this prefect ?
>
> like cant we do it like this
>
> access-list 101 permit ip host 49.1.0.1 any
> access-list 101 permit ip host 49.1.1.1 any
> access-list 101 permit ip host 49.1.2.1 any
> access-list 101 permit ip host 49.1.3.1 any
>
> route-map Ospf_Redist permit
> match ip addr 101
>
> if asked in lab should i go for the first approach or the next one ?
>
> --
> Noc engineer
> netenrich
>
> I have super powers i just dont wanna show you..
>
> http://diaryofccie.blogspot.com
>

-- 
I have super powers i just dont wanna show you..
http://diaryofccie.blogspot.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net