RE: CCIE Hardware

From: Rob Phillips <rrphillips_at_swankav.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:24:48 -0600

Narbik(or anyone),

Do you know which parts of the blue print are missing on a 2600XM? I am
running 124-15.T10 advanced enterprise and I can do zone based firewalls
as well as MPLS with them without any problem. I had to max out the
memory and flash but getting the chips need was pretty cheap. So far I
haven't seen anything missing.

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Narbik Kocharians
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 8:20 PM
To: Tom Solski
Cc: Haroon; Cisco Fanatic; all.from.nj_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: CCIE Hardware

Sure if you like to pay the $$$$. You can get 4 3725s for the price of
one
2811.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Tom Solski <tom.solski_at_gmail.com>
wrote:

> Did you consider dynamips? It runs all you need (except switches) and
> experience is same as real thing if not better.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Haroon
> Sent: 19-Nov-09 21:08
> To: Narbik Kocharians
> Cc: Cisco Fanatic; all.from.nj_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: CCIE Hardware
>
> Narbik,
>
> Any other alternative to 3725s? How about 2811s? Keep things nice and
slim
> and up to 1U space in the rack...
>
> thanks,
>
> haroon
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I would NOT recommend 2600XMs any more unless you are going to use
them
> as
> > a
> > BB router, i recommend 3725s because they run the latest T code,
with
> that
> > you can get ZBFW, MPLS and everything in the blueprint.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Cisco Fanatic
> > <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > I wish .. then I do not have to buy the receiver for an extra
$99.00.
> > >
> > > Good idea and recommendation for Cisco. Listen to XM and work on
CCIE
> > > stuff.
> > > Wow !!!
> > > Follow Cisco Mantra - Live, Work and Play.
> > >
> > > -Yuri
> > >
> > > > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:26:19 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: CCIE Hardware
> > > > From: all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
> > > > To: ebay_products_at_hotmail.com
> > > > CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > > >
> > > > I think the XM includes a satellite radio receiver. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Cisco Fanatic
> > > <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's a rack and not racks :)
> > > > >
> > > > > From: ebay_products_at_hotmail.com
> > > > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > > > > Subject: CCIE Hardware
> > > > > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:19:27 -0800
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have my CCIE racks with couple of 2600's. I will be
replacing
> them
> > > with
> > > > > 2600XM's.
> > > > >
> > > > > - I was wondering what's the meaning of XM?
> > > > > - Also, how would I know for sure as what Cisco IOS mainline
> features
> > > are
> > > > > supported in 2600XM vs 2600?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Q. What is the difference between the Cisco 2600XM
platforms
> and
> > > the
> > > > > older,
> > > > > non-XM platforms?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > A. The
> > > > > new Cisco 2600XM models are based on the previous Cisco
2610-51
> > Series
> > > > > platform design and configuration, but extend the performance
as
> much
> > > > > as 33% and increase memory capacity as well as increasing the
> default
> > > > > memory when compared to the previous Cisco 2610-2651
platforms,
> > > > > including support for Cisco IOS mainline features. This new XM
> > > > > functionality provides the same proven technology of the
previous
> > Cisco
> > > > > 2610-51 platforms, with additional benefits and the same cost
> > effective
> > > > > solution pricing.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Yuri
> > > > >
> > > > > Windows 7: I wanted simpler, now it's simpler. I'm a rock
star.
> > > > >
Received on Thu Nov 19 2009 - 21:24:48 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:29 ART