No offense but you still haven't answered my question. What's the point
of posing a question and then stating cisco's best practices as a
solution. It would have been less of a waste of time to post that in the
first place and then ask for comments if that's what you wanted to do. If
you really had a question then you should have looked it up first and not
posted at all. You have just again contributed to the obvious list
pollution in my opinion. By the time I posted (the correct solution I
might add) you had already moved on to scolding the IE's for not answering
correctly and the non-CCIE's like me for not even attempting. I found
that more than a little arrogant since you seemed to have had the answer
all along. I am sick of the sales chatter and the posts about Darby's
adventures in the blogosphere just like everyone else, but this sort of
thing doesn't help either. At least you can tell the other stuff is
garbage from the subject line. As for the workbooks, I don't think
practice labs ever stopped anyone from passing the lab that would have
passed in the first place. So if you learn 3 ways to solve the same
problem and can't figure out which one isn't ridiculous maybe you should
be reading more instead of using someone's practice lab as a how-to for
the real lab.
From:
Johnny B CCIE <jbccie_at_gmail.com>
To:
groupstudy <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Date:
11/14/2009 08:18 PM
Subject:
Re: 3 vlans and a problem
Sent by:
<nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
Keegan,
Sir, so far I have seen a lot of non-technical babble and even contributed
to the pollution myself more than I'd like to admit. I have been looking
at
a lot of training from vendors too. I have a limited time to accomplish my
goal and pass a lab. I looked the current offerings and more often than
not
I see material being sold that is trying to renew itself or looks like
someone is writing training material and mock labs that is meant to
challenge either existing ccies or other trainers. I had to to look for
something else. Sometimes we are over engineering the simple and sublime.
We
do that a lot. People fail the lab as a result of knowing 3 ways to solve
a
task that only really has 2 logical outcomes. So while I am
soliticing answers to questions I think are primal to the success of any
of
us who has to take the lab with these real lab questions I am also
wondering
now why so many of come up with more than what is required. Are we
over-trained?
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 7:08 PM, <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> wrote:
>
> A better question would be why are you asking a question if you already
> know the answer?
>
>
>
> From:
> Johnny B CCIE <jbccie_at_gmail.com>
> To: groupstudy <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> Date: 11/14/2009 12:12 PM
> Subject: Re: 3 vlans and a problem Sent by: <nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> The correct and recommended answer is bridging. However due to the
> wording of the question and new topics introduced into the lab other
> options can be considered including vrf lite and private vlans. So
> points on re-grade but no immediate pass.
>
> I don't understand why anyone but someone with a ccie will attempt to
> discuss things related to lab studies.
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Tony Schaffran (GS)
> <groupstudy_at_cconlinelabs.com> wrote:
> > Are you familiar with bridging?
> >
> > Tony Schaffran
> > Sr. Network Consultant
> > CCIE #11071
> > CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> > NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
> >
> > CCOnlineLabs
> > Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
<nobody_at_groupstudy.com>]
> On Behalf Of
> > Johnny B CCIE
> > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:17 PM
> > To: groupstudy
> > Subject: 3 vlans and a problem
> >
> > Let's say I have 3 vlans (10, 20, and 30).
> > Let's say I have a lab requirement to configure all three vlans to use
> > the same subnet: 172.16.10.0/24 (for each vlan).
> >
> > What options are available to make these three vlans appear to be in
> > the same subnet?
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
Received on Sun Nov 15 2009 - 12:25:40 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:29 ART