Re: 3 vlans and a problem

Fair enough. Even a ccna like me can use google. :) If there is a
problem and a ccie can't or won't help out because they simply don't
want to I'd have a position to fill or find a new company to contract
with. I've never heard of any ccie being called arrogant either.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Gary Duncanson
<gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> Or it could be that those CCIE's dont use wireless much. Since wireless was
> dropped from previous CCIE written versions there will be many CCIE's who
> are shy on even wireless theory let alone configuration. A lot of network
> engineers dont go near wireless, either because it's not used in their shop
> or they simply don't want to :)
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johnny B CCIE" <jbccie_at_gmail.com>
> To: "groupstudy" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: 3 vlans and a problem
>
>
>> Yes but what some options to configure this bridge? We are ccie
>> students so we should not only want to know what a technology is but
>> how to configure the technology, if there are options, and most
>> importantly how we are going to do to verifty and troubleshoot a
>> problem. A friend of mine who is a ccna wireless is always amazed in
>> wireless networks when the ccie type from cisco partners cannot seem
>> to get this to work right. He calls me laughing when ccies can not
>> troubleshoot the problem but it might because the concept was missing
>> in the first place.
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:13 AM, <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Welcome mr bridge...
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Johnny B CCIE <jbccie_at_gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:01:28
>>> To: groupstudy<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>> Subject: Re: 3 vlans and a problem
>>>
>>> So far 2 ccies have come to the same conclusion of private vlans maybe
>>> I was not clear enough with the question but I reworded my query very
>>> closely to the original question. I am not asking questions I do not
>>> already have an answer for by the way. I merely am starting a review
>>> of things I want to know perfectly before my trip to the lab.
>>>
>>> I suppose we can use private vlans to apply the same subnet mask but
>>> we would have achieved the exact opposite of the desired outcome for
>>> this question. So private vlans will achieve the the lab requirement
>>> to allow all three vlans to use the same subnet however 0 points will
>>> be awarded for the task. Maybe there will be points awarded for
>>> re-grade or maybe not. Anyone want to try again?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Johnny B CCIE <jbccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Let's say I have 3 vlans (10, 20, and 30).
>>>> Let's say I have a lab requirement to configure all three vlans to use
>>>> the same subnet: 172.16.10.0/24 (for each vlan).
>>>>
>>>> What options are available to make these three vlans appear to be in
>>>> the same subnet?
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Nov 14 2009 - 11:23:13 ART