Re: VPN Redurect traffic

Cisco has a few published and well documented topologies like what you
are describing. I have a more custom type of configuration that I use
for this scenario. I can login to any spoke router and manage of any
of the other spokes or hubs without the use of DMVPN.

You can build an ipsec tunnel between your hubs. It is a little more
complex but it is eloquent. Use your loopbacks. My configuration uses
two loopbacks and a little extra nat with inside and outside being
natted on one of the loopback addresses and uses access lists to
permit the interesting traffic to pass.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:33 AM, faizan khurshid
<faizankhurshid921_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All
>
>
> Issue regarding HUB and spoke topology .I have Two RTR Primary and seconday i
> configured remote access VPN on Head office Permiter RTR to remotely acces
> my head office and branches .Actually im facing Issue is that the few
> branches terminate on Secondary RTR which i m not able to access them remotely
> coz i know the reson i configrued Remote access vpn on permiter RTR
> .is ther any possbiility to redirect my traffic so im able to remotely access
> my those branches which comes from secondary router
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
> http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/soci
> al-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_1:092010
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Nov 14 2009 - 02:34:18 ART