Re: R&S Written v4.0 Beta (Results Are Shipping and Quick

From: Samurai Jack <rs_at_resilient-consulting.com.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:38:58 +1100

Marko,

you sure about that? Passing CCDA and then *if* passing the CCIE written+
Lab suffices for CCDP requirements? So no need to do CCNA,BSCI,BCMSN and
proceed straight to CCDP exam? I always thought that a CCIE can not be
counted towards the requirements for CCDP.

Would be great if you could post any link from Cisco on this.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Martijn Minis <martijn.minis_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> While I'd say the CCIE would be 'higher' I'm still proud that I've
> obtained the 'lower' certs, even the 'Firewall specialist' title for
> example. I still had to work for it, just less then I'm doing now for
> passing the lab :)
>
>
>
> 2009/11/11 Scott M Vermillion <scott_ccie_list_at_it-ag.com>:
> > Yep, that looks familiar.
> >
> > FYI, passing the lab won't recertify your lower certs (for some odd
> reason)
> > -- only a written does that. I've heard some folks say that they don't
> care
> > about maintaining any of their lower certs once they achieve CCIE status
> but
> > I personally know one gentleman who claims to receive higher offers on
> the
> > basis of his CCVP than his R&S IE. I personally care because I hold the
> > DA/DP, which serves as at least a minor indicator of design aptitude.
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:13 , Martijn Minis wrote:
> >
> >> FYI:
> >>
> >> Nov 10, 2009 Aug 14, 2009 Exam (350-001) CCIE Routing and
> >> Switching - Passed
> >> Aug 14, 2009 Aug 14, 2009 Exam (351-001) CCIE Routing and
> >> Switching (Beta) - Replaced
> >>
> >> My CCxA en CCxP certifications were updated, so I'm good for some time
> >> hereafter (and, ofcourse, after passing the lab :) )
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2009/11/11 Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 23:12, Scott M Vermillion
> >>> <scott_ccie_list_at_it-ag.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Good work sir!
> >>>>
> >>>> I just went and checked and I have been updated in both PearsonVue and
> >>>> the
> >>>> Cisco Certification Tracking System. Interestingly, I have an entry
> in
> >>>> my
> >>>> history showing 351-001/taken as having been replaced with
> 350-001/pass
> >>>> (the
> >>>> minor difference being the beta test number vs. the production test
> >>>> number).
> >>>> So I suspect that when I finally get around to opening that support
> >>>> case,
> >>>> Cisco is going to tell me I have to wait the full six months before
> >>>> being
> >>>> eligible to recertify, as I have passed 350-001 and will need to
> re-sit
> >>>> that
> >>>> very same exam number. A bit of a bummer but not entirely
> surprising...
> >>>
> >>> Same here with me now. I'm mentally preparing for (another) Cisco cert
> >>> support case to begin explaining how this is supposed to recertify my
> >>> CCIE until 2013 (I've been eligible for recert when I took the test)
> >>> and not just CCxA and CCxP stuff.
> >>>
> >>> It will probably be less pain than explaining to them how CCDE written
> >>> does the same thing.
> >>>
> >>> *sigh*
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>>
> >>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> >>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >>> Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
> >>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Nov 12 2009 - 09:38:58 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:28 ART