Your numbers are inversely incorrect. Better to fail one honest CCIE
aspirant and stop thousands of cheaters. Isn't this what you meant to
say? That is what Cisco is doing.
Honestly should the OEQ stop a well-prepared candidate? Should
troubleshooting 3-4 routers a total of 10 times? Configuring a lab
that was was 50 tasks that has been reduced to 30 odd tasks? The
training materials are fine. It just takes longer to build a real
CCIE. That is all there is to it.
The frog is correct.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Tomasz Solski <tom.solski_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I see your point. It is better to fail hudreds of honest CCIEs aspirants the
> let one cheater go away...
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> <rant start>
>>
>> I guess, its not a papper lab anymore. \
>>
>> I know a fresh college student guy who have never seen or touched a real
>> router in his life passed R&S lab on first attempt just using the dynamips.
>> He told me that he had 7 set of R&S real lab questions and one of the set
>> is
>> what he got in the lab. that was exactly the same.
>>
>> On the good side of it is he is not able to find the job yet. Nobody is
>> employing him even he has CCIE in R&S.!
>>
>> now what about those CCIE factories?
>> Those CCIE butchers who have been selling real ccie lab questions.
>> Develauting the value of it. I guess those factories must have been closed
>> by now!! They're gone out of business/bankcurrupt!!
>> ha.hh.ha...
>>
>> ***Well done Cisco**
>>
>> </rant over>
>>
>> -frog
>>
>> On
>> Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Johnny B CCIE <jbccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Which is why I wonder why a current CCIE seems to have never been able
>> > to pass a new revision of the CCIE Lab? If a person knows the
>> > technologies how can they fail? Some of the best trainers and writers
>> > for the CCIE are the ones who are failing these new labs since the 1
>> > day was introduced in 2001 and again now. Why can't they pass?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:59 AM, <Charles.Henson_at_regions.com> wrote:
>> > > Considering I have suffered thru and failed the lab honestly I find
>> that
>> > > thread absolutely infuriating. I'm not calling them cheaters. But it
>> > seems
>> > > more an act of desperation than anything. I wish these "who'll pass
>> > first"
>> > > threads would go away and we can stick to the technical stuff. The
>> > answers
>> > > to the lab are more obvious now than ever before.
>> > >
>> > > 1. Know EVERYTHING on the blueprint backwards and forwards.
>> > > 2. Know EVERY command and EVERY argument for that command.
>> > > 3. UNDERSTAND items 1 and 2 and how they relate and function. (This is
>> > key)
>> > > 4. Type 125-150 wpm.
>> > >
>> > > PASS
>> > >
>> > > Charles Henson
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > From: Johnny B CCIE <jbccie_at_gmail.com>
>> > >
>> > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> > >
>> > > Date: 11/09/2009 08:52 AM
>> > >
>> > > Subject: Re: 21 days and no pass ..
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > This is what I'd call fudge factor:
>> > > http://certcollection.org/forum/thread-20816.html
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Gary Duncanson
>> > > <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Well you have a doyen Phil Remaker called in there to take a new
>> format
>> > > lab
>> > >> getting 34 %. Did he suddenly become less capable? Of course not. It
>> > > was
>> > >> simply a new thing.
>> > >>
>> > >> I have no idea what fudge factor study aids are.
>> > >>
>> > >> Steller people will still pass the CCIE lab exam regardless of study
>> > >> materials used because there are three things vendors cant sell you.
>> > >>
>> > >> 1. A good brain
>> > >> 2. time
>> > >> 3. experience
>> > >>
>> > >> 1+2+3 = Version v4 lab pass in due course.
>> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johnny B CCIE" <jbccie_at_gmail.com>
>> > >> To: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> > >> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 1:54 PM
>> > >> Subject: Re: 21 days and no pass ..
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>> I'm sure people are scoring better than 34%. There are just no aids
>> to
>> > >>> provide the extra fudge factor at the present time.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200107/msg00875.html
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Gary Duncanson
>> > >>> <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> It's not easier, if it was people would be sailing through. We
>> haven't
>> > >>>> suddenly run out of capable students studying properly, they are out
>> > >>>> there
>> > >>>> and still at it.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> It's different and that requires tactical adjustments from students
>> > and
>> > >>>> trainers. Certainly there are decent training materials out there
>> but
>> > >>>> there
>> > >>>> have been for years right back to NMC.
>> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johnny B CCIE" <
>> jbccie_at_gmail.com>
>> > >>>> To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> > >>>> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 1:27 PM
>> > >>>> Subject: Re: 21 days and no pass ..
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Correct. If anything the lab is easier now. Only 4 points for oeq.
>> > >>>>> Troubleshooting should be something we learned while doing our
>> labs.
>> > >>>>> The lab itself only has 5 routers now instead of six. So really it
>> is
>> > >>>>> easier for those who prepare well. We have the best training prep
>> > >>>>> materials ever available to any ccies who ever took the lab. We
>> can't
>> > >>>>> ask for much more than this.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Marko Milivojevic
>> > > <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>> > >>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:45, Johnny B CCIE <jbccie_at_gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> About 3 months of drought and 6 months for the flooding to start.
>> > >>>>>>> This time it is different and there is more higher quality
>> training
>> > >>>>>>> material available than ever before.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> There is much bigger change this time, as the format itself is
>> > >>>>>> changed. It will simply take time for people to adjust their
>> > studying
>> > >>>>>> method.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I wouldn't be too worried.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> > >>>>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>> > >>>>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> > >>>>>> Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
>> > >>>>>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> > >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Nov 09 2009 - 19:18:28 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:28 ART