AW: AW: bad proctor

Ah I see ;-)

-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Charles.Henson_at_Regions.com [mailto:Charles.Henson_at_Regions.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 9. November 2009 23:02
An: Florian Frotzler
Cc: 'groupstudy'; nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Betreff: Re: AW: bad proctor

Florian,
      I was saying that I wish I could have a relax dress code like that.
Nothing more.

Charles Henson

  From: "Florian Frotzler" <florian_at_frotzler.priv.at>

  To: "'groupstudy'" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>

  Date: 11/09/2009 03:42 PM

  Subject: AW: bad proctor

So proctor is no real job because his dress code did not fit you, are you
for real? WTF?

-F-

-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] Im Auftrag von
Charles.Henson_at_regions.com
Gesendet: Montag, 9. November 2009 22:20
An: Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com
Cc: ccie preparation; Cisco certification; Iwan Hoogendoorn;
nobody_at_groupstudy.com; Smooth IE
Betreff: Re: bad proctor

Again, that's your view and that's fine. I just don't look at it the same
way. Personally, I had Howard at RTP at my last attempt and the only thing
that bothered me was his relax dress code that he enjoys every day. And it
only bothered me because I have to go back to my real job with my real
business attire.

Charles Henson

  From: <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com>

  To: Smooth IE <smoothccie_at_googlemail.com>

  Cc: ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, Charles.Henson_at_regions.com,
              Iwan Hoogendoorn <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com

  Date: 11/09/2009 03:08 PM

  Subject: Re: bad proctor

I disagree as well. Not only the money but if cisco refuses to do anything
about "proctor Joe" then the only recourse is a public forum. We certainly
wouldn't win any lawsuits individually. Maybe proctor Joe cleans up his
act if he keeps seeing his name here. Or maybe we identify a few people
who were less than honest about their lab experience. Either way I think
discussion is a good thing.

 Fro Smooth IE <smoothccie_at_googlemail.com>
 m:

 To: Charles.Henson_at_regions.com

 Cc: Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com, ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com>, Cisco
     certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, Iwan Hoogendoorn
     <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com

 Dat 11/09/2009 11:18 AM
 e:

 Sub Re: bad proctor
 jec
 t:

I disagree.

We pay a hell of a lot of money for these exams (some of us, from our
personal savings) and we have every right to discuss this in this manner.

2009/11/9 <Charles.Henson_at_regions.com>
I'm not faulting anyone in this case. Whenever someone mentions they've
been to the lab, we always ask for details. I understand. But an
individuals experience with a proctor is not the same thing as "How do you
like the new interface?" Even if other folks say they've had similar issues
with the proctor in question. That is even more the reason that these
people should take it to Cisco and keep it off the thread. The last thing I
want is "Proctor Joe" to remember me from the forums when I walk in the lab
and then I'm already off on a bad note. Or worse, "Proctor Joe" gets p1ss3d
off that everyone is blasting him on the forums and then everyone taking
the lab is off on a bad note. Sorry, I feel this doesn't need to be on the
VERY PUBLIC forums.

Charles Henson

 From: <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com>

 To: Charles.Henson_at_regions.com

 Cc: ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification <
ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, Iwan Hoogendoorn
             <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com

 Date: 11/09/2009 09:53 AM

 Subject: Re: bad proctor

I see your point, but I don't think asking for more information is
necessary unprofessional. The entire point of this list is to share
information on the lab. That and those of us who have never sat for a lab
can't help but be curious. Professionalism is a must, but you can't fault
us for asking questions.

From:
<Charles.Henson_at_regions.com>
To:
Iwan Hoogendoorn <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>
Cc:
ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Date:
11/09/2009 09:55 AM
Subject:
Re: bad proctor
Sent by:
<nobody_at_groupstudy.com>

Guys,
     I am curious myself as to what the issue was but this is not the
place. If he has an issue with a proctor that should be between him and
Cisco. Not posted on a public forum. Let's keep in professional. So many
other threads are clearly lacking that.....

Charles Henson

 From: Iwan Hoogendoorn <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>

 To: ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com>

 Cc: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>

 Date: 11/09/2009 04:00 AM

 Subject: Re: bad proctor

What happened that the proctor is that bad?

--
Regards,
Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
Sr. Support Engineer   IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:00 PM, ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>         I had a very bad procotor in brussels and want to complain about
> him, where should i send an e-mail or open a case?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
Sr. Support Engineer   IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net