Re: bad proctor

I'm not faulting anyone in this case. Whenever someone mentions they've
been to the lab, we always ask for details. I understand. But an
individuals experience with a proctor is not the same thing as "How do you
like the new interface?" Even if other folks say they've had similar issues
with the proctor in question. That is even more the reason that these
people should take it to Cisco and keep it off the thread. The last thing I
want is "Proctor Joe" to remember me from the forums when I walk in the lab
and then I'm already off on a bad note. Or worse, "Proctor Joe" gets p1ss3d
off that everyone is blasting him on the forums and then everyone taking
the lab is off on a bad note. Sorry, I feel this doesn't need to be on the
VERY PUBLIC forums.

Charles Henson

                                                                                                                             
  From: <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com>
                                                                                                                             
  To: Charles.Henson_at_regions.com
                                                                                                                             
  Cc: ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, Iwan Hoogendoorn
              <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com
                                                                                                                             
  Date: 11/09/2009 09:53 AM
                                                                                                                             
  Subject: Re: bad proctor
                                                                                                                             

I see your point, but I don't think asking for more information is
necessary unprofessional. The entire point of this list is to share
information on the lab. That and those of us who have never sat for a lab
can't help but be curious. Professionalism is a must, but you can't fault
us for asking questions.

From:
<Charles.Henson_at_regions.com>
To:
Iwan Hoogendoorn <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>
Cc:
ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Date:
11/09/2009 09:55 AM
Subject:
Re: bad proctor
Sent by:
<nobody_at_groupstudy.com>

Guys,
      I am curious myself as to what the issue was but this is not the
place. If he has an issue with a proctor that should be between him and
Cisco. Not posted on a public forum. Let's keep in professional. So many
other threads are clearly lacking that.....

Charles Henson

  From: Iwan Hoogendoorn <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>

  To: ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com>

  Cc: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>

  Date: 11/09/2009 04:00 AM

  Subject: Re: bad proctor

What happened that the proctor is that bad?

--
Regards,
Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:00 PM, ccie preparation <ccie22_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>         I had a very bad procotor in brussels and want to complain about
> him, where should i send an e-mail or open a case?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net