RE: DMVPN phase 3 example

These are phase 2 examples

From: Donald Virgil [mailto:d.virgil88_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:13 PM
To: Marcin Zgola
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DMVPN phase 3 example

Sounds like you need a DUAL Hub, DUAL DMVPN arcticture. You can control
Phase 3 through tunnel interface EIGRP metrics.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_white_paper0918
6a008018983e.shtml#dualhubdual

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Marcin Zgola <MZgola_at_netrixllc.com>
wrote:

YES, with spokes connecting to different hubs I want to be able to have
spoke to spoke connectivity

From: Donald Virgil [mailto:d.virgil88_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:10 PM
To: Marcin Zgola
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DMVPN phase 3 example

Would you still need dynamic connectivity between SPOKE1 and SPOKE2?

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Marcin Zgola <MZgola_at_netrixllc.com>
wrote:

Any examples out there to run 2 hubs, and 2 spokes using DMVPN phase 3
EIGRP.

Where spoke 1 uses hub 1 as primary, and spoke 2 uses hub 2 as primary.

I am comfortable setting this up using phase 2, where all you have to do
is modify routing protocol to accomplish that.

Since phase 3 uses NHRP for its packet switching , gets me little
confused about setup like that.

Thanks

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net <http://www.ccie.net/>
Received on Thu Nov 05 2009 - 18:19:09 ART