What version of the lab did you take? Did you have to pass two parts or one to get your number? Did you have to take a mini-exam where personal interpretation combined with an extremely small sample set determined your outcome? I'm sorry to break this to you, but the CCIE numbers didn't jump off the charts with OEQ's. The delta between the number of questions you could get wrong between your version of the exam and post OEQ's is 4. You were given 30 minutes more to complete them and you were able to approach the lab with a clear mind. One of the main factors that so many people are having trouble with version 4 is that there are two new comers to the exam, still fresh OEQs and troubleshooting. To anyone who has sat the exam with OEQs, at least one of the questions is hard. It's fairly easy to let those questions cloud your mind during the exam. Imagine if you were unsure of two, don't you think that would throw you off your game? If you were to dissect version 4 in!
to 3 parts, I'm sure it would be less of a challenge.
Once again, I'm wondering what you actually add to this list, besides showing the world that you're a clown puncher.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Atlanta CCIE
> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:40 AM
> To: Gary Duncanson; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: CCIE V4 lab failed yesterday
>
> Because you had to score 59 on the lab to pass :)
>
> On 11/5/09, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Atlanta,
> >
> > Can you please clarify why you think the CCIE's who passed between
> Feb and
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Nov 04 2009 - 10:24:58 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:28 ART