RE: route-map dilemma

Hi Bryan, The example was from my Lab setup and I saw all the routes getting
the communities. Was not 100% sure if this was the right behavior and hence
asked if there is a link or an example to validate my assumption.

Thanks for confirming it ...

-Yuri

Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:15:33 -0700
Subject: Re: route-map dilemma
From: bbartik_at_ipexpert.com
To: ebay_products_at_hotmail.com
CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com

Yuri,

Lab and see! :) In my lab it matches all routes and thus all routes will get
the communities, etc...

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cisco Fanatic <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com>
wrote:

All,

Playing with route-map ...

!

router bgp 65210

  aggregate-address 172.19.248.0 255.255.248.0 summary-only attribute-map AGG

  redistribute static route-map TAG_ROUTES

  redistribute ospf 1 route-map TAG_ROUTES

!

route-map TAG_ROUTES permit 10

 match ip address prefix-list ROUTES <--

 set origin igp

 set community 65210:10

!

If a route-map references in a match condition a prefix-list that is not

defined, is that considered a match or not?

Any link which can explain ..

-Yuri
Received on Tue Nov 03 2009 - 19:03:59 ART