RE: Cisco GET VPN in transport mode

From: Hans None <acsyao_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:53:13 +0000

I have read the following on GET VPN in transport mode:

IPsec transport mode suffers from fragmentation and reassembly limitations and
must not be used in
deployments where encrypted or clear packets might require fragmentation.

I do not understand why transport mode suffer fragmentation and reassembly.

> From: markcciejackson_at_gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:44:46 -0800
> Subject: Re: Cisco GET VPN in transport mode
> To: acsyao_at_hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> It is mainly because Cisco cannot initate/terminate transport mode
> IPSec tunnel. Getvpn works mainly in changing the header, it's
> actually not changing but the same idea. Mire a copy and paste.
>
> Mark Jackson, CCIE#4736
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Please excuse spelling errors
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Hans None <acsyao_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know why Cisco GET VPN does not work in IPSEC transport
> > mode?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place.
> >
http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurants&form=MFESRP&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_M
> > FESRP_Local_MapsMenu_Resturants_1x1
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Received on Tue Nov 03 2009 - 20:53:13 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:28 ART