Christopher,
Great to have another R&S 4.0 story here ...
Too bad you know you failed ... next time better man!
-- Regards, Iwan Hoogendoorn CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP) Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Christopher Copley <copley.chris_at_gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > I just got back from the lab yesterday and I have to say the above comments > in this post are right on 100%. IMHO there are no more so called core and > non-core tasks! You have to now go into the lab with a nearly perfect > knowledge of EVERY THING on the blue print. In my past studies I focused > very hard on L2, L3 & some of the smaller topics like services (i.e. ntp, > drp, netflow, etc) I knew well, but knew where they were in the DocCD. > ***YOU CAN NOT DO THIS NOW!!!!****. With out breaking NDA, lets say you > have a question in trouble shooting on what in the past was a Non-Core > topic. You DO NOT have time to go to the DocCD. You have to be able to > spit out any solution both Core and Non-Core and any tweek on it with out > looking at the DocCD. > > I have worked on my company's IT Emergency Response Team for a number of > years now, and I have to say the way the new Trouble shooting section is > designed made me feel like I was in a ERT swarm session. The time limit and > the clock counting down adds a TON of pressure!!! The only thing that was > missing was a VP, and CIO standing over my shoulder with a upset look on > their face!!! > > I will agree with what everything people are saying about the Trouble > shooting Section. The question are VERY vague, but in my experience this is > the type of trouble tickets I get at work. Typically I get tickets from my > NOC that say network node "X" is unreachable, and that is ALL that is in the > ticket. I think the CCIE team must have asked customers for copies of there > NOC tickets and emulated them in the exam. This new Trouble Shooting > section really raises the bar and the focus on the CCIE exam. This is not > my first attempt at the lab, and I will say it is totally different that the > V3 lab. > > I feel we all have to shift the way we study in order to pass the new exam. > I would not say memorize the Non-core tasks but learn them just as well as > core tasks. Focus on the Blue Print VERY VERY hard. If it is on the Blue > Print know it 125% If you see it on the Blue print you have to be able to > spit out every thing on the subject with out the DocCD for any help!!! > > OEQ - Same old stuff, nothing new here. But I feel with the new Trouble > shooting section it is now pointless and a waist of time. > > Config section - Just like every one has said, there are less sections, but > more tasks in each section. So basically the same old lab in a 5.5 hour > session. No time for the DocCD if you need help. You have to be in a rush > the whole lab. I really recommend that everyone goes any buys a stop watch > and start timing your config sections and find ways to shorten your time on > every study section. > > > My results - I dont have the official results yet, but I already know I > failed. I was not able to get enough trouble tickets done by the time > limit. I did the math and knew I did not reach the ~80% to pass. When > the clock hit and I knew I did not pass the TS it took me nearly 30 min to > pick my self up and continue on with the config section. Knowing that the > rest of my day was basically a waist of my time, I found it VERY hard to > bring myself to go through the pain of the rest of the lab, when I knew it > was in vain. > > I am going to go back to study and shift my focus, and try again in maybe 6 > or 9 months. Service Provider here I come!!! > > I hope this helps everyone out there, and good luck!!! > > Chris > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat Oct 31 2009 - 16:22:53 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:51:01 ART