Re: Retreat hell! I just got here!

No worries, You'll do it next tym!!!

I wont mind if Cisco adds 1 more hour to the test, they should understand
that we are in no hurry to get to the hotel ;)

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Nathan Richie <nathanr_at_boice.net> wrote:

> I would not have simply because I ran out of time on the configuration
> portion. I will definitely be working on my lab strategy and timing going
> in
> next time.
>
> As Michael pointed out in his review, you really don't have time to read
> and
> diagram. It really ate up too much of my time yesterday.
>
> From: Atlanta CCIE [mailto:atlantaccie_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:40 AM
> To: Michael Marvel
> Cc: Nathan Richie; CCIE Groupstudy
> Subject: Re: Retreat hell! I just got here!
>
> Great reviews Nathan and Mike! I wish you guys goodluck for the next
> attempt.
>
> Did you guys think you would have passed if there were no OEQs?
>
> Thanks!
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Michael Marvel
> <mmarvel37122_at_gmail.com<mailto:mmarvel37122_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
> I was with Nathan at RTP yesterday and also took the v4 lab and I'd have to
> say that his critique is right on the mark. The only thing I would add,
> since this wasn't my first attempt, is that the amount of material in the
> configuration section is pretty close to what it was before the
> troubleshooting section was added, they just consolidated what used to be
> individual tasks into single tasks. For example, without giving any great
> detail, what used to be maybe 3 tasks in EGP is now a single task... same
> number of steps just not split up.
>
> A note on time management... In previous attempts, I would read through the
> entire lab, draw it out, try to understand what is coming up. I usually
> would have time to troubleshoot at the end of the time on the old exam.
> This plan will not work anymore, especially if you get tasks that you don't
> know how to implement off the top of your head and have to hit the DocCD.
> It almost seemed like they wrote the lab on the assumption that the
> troubleshooting section wouldn't take a full 2 hours.
>
> No comments on OEQ, they are what they are and, like Nathan, I also thought
> I had more right that Cisco did.
>
> Now, like Nathan, I start preparing for my next attempt.
>
> On a side note, I definately see how they could be positioning the new test
> as something that could be taken at any VUE center. My only problem is
> that
> I wouldn't want to sit in any of the VUE testing centers around here for 8
> hours. :)
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> CCIE# 17xxx
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Asif Khan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net