Re: OSPF --) prefix-suppression

From: garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:06:27 +0300

guess i need to load the T version (12.4(15)T) cause i didnt have this
command on my 12.4(21a) routers...

but in my attempt to test i found this interface command:

ip ospf 1 area 0 secondaries none

similar but not the same? not sure, but i dig this two router testing
idea...

R4 <-> R3

R4:
interface Loopback0
 ip address 200.4.4.4 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf 1 area 0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 1.1.1.4 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf 1 area 0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 ip address 3.3.3.4 255.255.255.0 secondary
 ip address 2.2.2.4 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf 1 area 0

R3#sh ip route
     200.4.4.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 200.4.4.4 [110/11] via 1.1.1.4, 00:02:41, FastEthernet0/0
     1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 2.2.2.0 [110/20] via 1.1.1.4, 00:02:41, FastEthernet0/0
     100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 100.3.3.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
     3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 3.3.3.0 [110/20] via 1.1.1.4, 00:02:41, FastEthernet0/0

R4:
R4#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
R4(config)#int f0/1
R4(config-if)#ip ospf 1 area 0 secondaries none
R4(config-if)#

THE secondary from int f0/1 on R4 disappears on R3:
R3:
R3#sh ip route
     200.4.4.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 200.4.4.4 [110/11] via 1.1.1.4, 00:00:09, FastEthernet0/0
     1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 2.2.2.0 [110/20] via 1.1.1.4, 00:00:09, FastEthernet0/0
     100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 100.3.3.0 is directly connected, Loopback0

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:32 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Similar as the default EIGRP stub feature? Seems this way ... Only not as
> versatile with it's options ...
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thoughts on how a question would be worded? "keep router 4 from being a
> transit router and ensure that none of the routers will choose R4 ...,
> maintain all ospf blah blah blah. you cannot use the max- metric command
> and must enable this with one global command"
>
> Also team, if any of you all have done this, perhaps on the spoke routers,
> please respond as well.
>
> Command reference:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute/command/reference/irp_osp2.html#wp1014135
>
> Feature overview:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute/configuration/guide/irp_ospf_ex_lsa_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Garry L. Baker
"There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 27 2009 - 19:06:27 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:51:01 ART