RE: Took Verison 4.0 R&S on Monday

From: Jackson, Tony <Tony.Jackson_at_mckesson.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:27:10 -0400

If you are solid you will breeze threw troubleshooting.

Lab is doable. I got lost and confused with the windows and diagrams.
The diagrams are horrible.

IE diagrams looks like CCIEs put them together. These diagrams were very
cluttered.

It's hard but it's just another thing you have to get comfortable with.

OEQ - somebody mention CCNA type questions. Not the ones I got. They
were "if you studied the CCIE then you should know these". I actually
passed this part. But my rack or should I say session died after that.

Tony Jackson

Senior Network Engineer

Network Implementation Engineering, CIT

McKesson Corporation

404-461-1295 (Office)

404-759-6165 (Cell)

  _____

From: Divin Mathew John [mailto:divinjohn_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 1:17 PM
To: Jackson, Tony
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Took Verison 4.0 R&S on Monday

1) How was the troubleshooting tasks? [NON NDA Info ]

2) Was the lab config part easier?

3) overall is it doable ?

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Jackson, Tony <
Tony.Jackson_at_mckesson.com <mailto:Tony.Jackson_at_mckesson.com> > wrote:

I really don't want to blast Cisco but they make it hard not to.

What a mess!

Every thing is online, docs, diagrams. It looks like ASET labs. Java
based.

Your screen clutters fairly quickly.

They need to stop BETA testing these things with other Cisco engineers.

My advice is keep reading the doc CDs, with special emphasis on the
Blueprint.

I waited a grueling 3 hours to start.

Then the doc CD didn't work.

I really want my money back after that experience.

T.J.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net <http://www.ccie.net>
Received on Tue Oct 20 2009 - 13:27:10 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:51:00 ART