Re: IGP - Two point os redistrubution

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 09:09, Antonio Saez
<antonio.saez.jimenez_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am wondering how should I attack the labs with two point of mutual igp
> redistribution, with the typical route-map denying and setting route tags or
> with the distance x x.x.x.x y.y.y.y B acl approach??
>
> The route-map way is quickly and easier to implement, but Could it cost me
> any point in the exam??

Valid question. General Answer #1 to any sort of doubt like that is:
Ask the Proctor! Approach Proctor, explain the methods you think of
employing and ask him/her if they had any preference. Don't go and ask
"how do I do this", rather, "I can solve this question using X, Y or Z
- do you have any preference amongst them ".

Now, that said, General Answer #2 applies: Do what you are told! If WB
gives some implication for one solution (do not use route-maps, for
example), you know what to do. It is very important to read your WB
and understand the question. If you don't, see GA#1.

--
Marko
CCIE #18427 (SP)
My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net