RE: Anyone Going for v4 lab in october?

Dale when I said "CLI engineer", I meant I preferred CLI not literarily a
CLI engineer. If you've been a CLI interpreter since 93 as you said and
very familiar with Cisco from the onset, what drew commercial acceptance to
Cisco is the intuitiveness of their CLI. So thinking in that sense that is
why that statement was made. At least my voice system and SSL VPN just to
mention a few I support are not in CLI.

Oh well lets keep it technical no more direct attack.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Dale
Shaw
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 8:16 PM
To: babatunde sanda
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Anyone Going for v4 lab in october?

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:51 PM, babatunde sanda <sbabatunde1_at_ca.rr.com>
wrote:
>
> Being a CLI engineer I was super bored but still sat through anyways.

That's one of the most ridiculous things I've read on GroupStudy for a
while.

"CLI engineer" indeed.

I mean, sure, we all have our preferences, but ... yeah, that's ridiculous.

Does having a GUI bolted on to the front of something make what
happens under the hood any different? Do you think Cisco is/will be
testing your ability to click and drag a mouse around?

Lastly, did you ever try to use the CLI to a VPN3000?

cheers,
Dale
(a command line interface appreciator since 1993)

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Oct 19 2009 - 20:34:21 ART