Re: OT:Vsphere and Cisco's configuration

Ryan,
Thanks for the link, I did not check it before and will go through now. In
fact with vDS or with Nexus 1000 multiple hosts on different ESX hosts can
consititute private vlan.

My impression is that , i will have to permit all the vlans (pirmary and
secondary vlans) through every port where ESX hosts are connected (as they
are part of the same primary vlan) and in my case whole 48port modules
are connected to the ESX machines.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> I haven't done that configuration in vSphere, but everything I have read
> seems to read seems the same as Cisco documentation (at least on a theory
> level). Have you seen this doc?
> http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsphere4/r40/vsp_40_esx_server_config.pdf
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of S
> Malik
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 1:10 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: OT:Vsphere and Cisco's configuration
>
> MY Lan team likes to implement Private Vlan features in vSphere (vDS not
> Cisco's Nexus 1000) on the regular server farm (no DMZ).
>
> Has any one done this?
>
> I have a 48ports gig module and they like to implement it on all the
> servers.
>
> Any thoughts.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Oct 18 2009 - 16:41:48 ART