Re: need some help on object tracking

This shud help you ..
http://www.shafagh.net/2008/05/ccie-lab-ip-sla-with-hsrp.html

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:29 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I would study this for use with HSRP.
>
> "Have local HSRP become standby when the loopback0 of router4 is
> unavailable"
>
> Easy to test this config as well. HTH
>
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:37 AM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > not sure why you would ever do this (well the CCIE lab i guess??? and i
> > used
> > static routes i guess you could do the same with tracking and dynmaic
> > routes??? not sure about that one...) or if this meets the requirements
> but
> > it 'works' for lack of a better term...
> >
> > Router1---(f0/0 1.1.1.2), int tunnel 200 192.168.1.1)
> > ip sla monitor 2
> > type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 100.100.100.1
> > frequency 30
> > ip sla monitor schedule 2 life forever start-time now
> >
> > track 2 rtr 2 reachability
> > interface Tunnel200
> > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > keepalive 10 3
> > tunnel source 1.1.1.2
> > tunnel destination 200.200.200.1
> >
> > ip route 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.1 10 track 2
> > ip route 100.100.100.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.1 100
> > ip route 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 22
> >
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > Router 0 ----(f0/0 1.1.1.1, f0/1 3.3.3.1, int tunnel 200 192.168.1.2)
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > Router 2---(Loop 0 100.100.100.1, f0/0 3.3.3.2)
> >
> > R1:
> > R1#sh ip route
> > Gateway of last resort is not set
> > S 200.200.200.0/24 [10/0] via 1.1.1.1
> > 1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
> > 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > S 100.100.100.0 [100/0] via 1.1.1.1
> > R 3.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 1.1.1.1, 00:00:03, FastEthernet0/0
> > C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Tunnel200
> > R1#sh ip int br
> > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> > Protocol
> > FastEthernet0/0 1.1.1.2 YES manual up
> > up
> > FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively
> down
> > down
> > Tunnel200 192.168.1.1 YES manual up
> > up
> >
> >
> > R2:
> > R2(config)#int loopback 0 ***SHUTTING DOWN THE TRACKED 100.100.100.1
> > HERE****
> > R2(config-if)#shut
> > R2(config-if)#
> > *Mar 1 00:30:12.535: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Loopback0, changed state
> > to
> > administratively down
> > *Mar 1 00:30:13.535: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> > Loopback0, changed state to down
> > R2(config-if)#do sh ip int br
> > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> > Protocol
> > FastEthernet0/0 3.3.3.2 YES manual up
> > up
> > FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively
> down
> > down
> > Loopback0 100.100.100.1 YES manual administratively
> down
> > down
> >
> >
> >
> > R1: wait for the KEEPALIVES to KICK IN
> > R1#
> > *Mar 1 02:24:08.035: %TRACKING-5-STATE: 2 rtr 2 reachability Up->Down
> > *Mar 1 02:24:24.035: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> > Tunnel200, changed state to down
> > R1#sh ip route
> > Gateway of last resort is not set
> > S 200.200.200.0/24 is directly connected, Null0
> > 1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
> > 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > S 100.100.100.0 [100/0] via 1.1.1.1
> > R 3.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 1.1.1.1, 00:00:05, FastEthernet0/0
> > R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/1] via 1.1.1.1, 00:00:05, FastEthernet0/0
> >
> > R1#sh ip int br
> > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> > Protocol
> > FastEthernet0/0 1.1.1.2 YES manual up
> > up
> > FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively
> down
> > down
> > Tunnel200 192.168.1.1 YES manual up
> > down
> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Thameem Maranveetil Parambath <
> > security.goodie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > dears I have a scenario like this.. can some one give some solution?
> > >
> > >
> > > Router1
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > Router 2
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > Router 3 ---(10.119.0.0)
> > >
> > > Router1 and Router2 should have interface tunnel up and running. In
> > router
> > > 2 , i have to create an object tracking(IPSLA) on one IP (10.119.0.2)
> > which
> > > is beyound Router 3. When the IP is not reachable, i have to bring
> down
> > > the
> > > interface tunnel between Router 1 and Router 2.
> > >
> > > Can some one help?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Thameem
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Garry L. Baker
> >
> > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Will Rogers <http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1220.html>  - "Our
constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators."
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net