Re: Version of code for switches ... Dot1x

IMHO, don't bother.

On the other hand, know where to go look them up just in case!

I'd stick with 12.2(46) personally. But just my two cents.

Damn. That makes four cents tonight. I need change.

Scott

ALL From_NJ wrote:
> Interesting discussion for sure ...
>
> I was working on some labs, and the labs had me configure some dot1x stuff.
> After I was pulling my hair out I decided to look over the solutions and
> what do you know .. these commands do not exist on my switch.
>
> If anyone hears of anything, please pass it on.
>
> Think I should learn both new and old commands? Please say no ... ;-)
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_markom.info>wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 00:59, Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Where else would they put the information on switching though I wonder?
>>>
>> I
>>
>>> understand things are moving more to the virtual environment, at least
>>>
>> for
>>
>>> troubleshooting but lets face it, switching is still a big big part of
>>> things.
>>>
>> I remember few years back it wasn't, actually. It was just called R&S,
>> but it was truly R exam.
>>
>> If they indeed change the number of switches to one, it would be back
>> to being pointless. Unless, of course, they don't come up with some
>> sort of a "data center" track and combine switching and storage there.
>> It may actually make some sense.
>>
>> --
>> Marko
>> CCIE #18427 (SP)
>> My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Oct 17 2009 - 21:51:20 ART