Re: Cisco vs Juniper Security (OT)

From: Iwan Hoogendoorn <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:16:53 +0200

Hi,

I would probably still use Cisco because cisco is my relegion ...
But I havent actually done research on the Juniper security suite ...
I heard they have some great products available and some better the
cisco ... but then again M am planning to do some more juniper stuff
after the CCIE voice and probably I can give a straght answer... but
for now i'll go with the cisco stuff because I don't know juniper
stuff well enough to judge ...

-- 
Regards,
Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:57 AM, mark jackson <markcciejackson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> That will remain to be see with the possible Junioer buy of Riverbed.
> Although I feel that is more for their WAN optimazation product line.
> I have used both and although Juniper does allow for ease of use,
> Cisco remains (in my mind at least) a top player hands down.
> Cisco's security product line is more refined, widely regarded as top-
> notch and used in more enterprise environments. Even when not an end
> to end architecture.
> But truth be told what it boils down to is budget, ROI and staffing.
> Least not forget executive management (at the cto levels) comfort in
> whomever's product line. I think it's safe to say that no decision
> maker is going to go with a brand they have not had experience with
> out of fear of failure among other things.
> Thanks kindly.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Please excuse spelling errors
>
> On Oct 9, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Johnny Phan <johnny_d_phan_at_hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> To use Cisco or Juniper as a security device?  This was a semi
>> heated debate a
>> few months ago.  Things have changed so I think it's time to revisit
>> this.
>>
>> Various engineers sided with Cisco and others with Juniper.  There
>> seemed to
>> be some consensus though.  Many people said that management is so
>> much easier
>> using the netscreen.  Others said that Cisco support is tremendous.
>> Now we
>> can get that out of the way, let's revisit those issues.  I am not
>> talking
>> about using another device management software.  I am talking about
>> straight
>> out of the box, standalone device.
>>
>> The Juniper Netscreen is being phased out by devices runing JunOS,
>> especially
>> on the higher end devices, such as the netscreen 5400 being phased
>> out and
>> replaced by SRX.  So now that Juniper have moved away from their
>> bread and
>> butter, I would imagine more people will now lean more toward Cisco.
>>
>> I could be way off on this of course since I am not in the security
>> world.
>>
>> Let the fighting begin, again.
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- 
Regards,
Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Oct 10 2009 - 09:16:53 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:50:59 ART