Re: Requirement for full IP reachability in lab

From: William McCall <william.mccall_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:12:22 -0500

#2, unless they come out and say that you should have full reachability.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Gavin Schokman <g_schokman_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been doing labs from IEWB vol 2, ver 5.0 and a couple of times I've
> gotten stuck between the generic requirement statement at the start of the
> lab vs what the tasks ask me to do. In these labs, there is a statement in
> the lab exam instructions section indicating that full IP reachability is
> expected unless otherwise indicated. I read this to mean "by default, your
> goal is full reachability - unless we explicitly tell you not to".
>
> However when doing the lab tasks, I've found that when the tasks are
> completed and put together they only set up partial reachability in the
> topology.
>
> So my question is this -
> are we supposed to aim to get full reachability every time (unless
> explicitly told not to), potentially having to do extra configuration work
> above the actual wording of the tasks,
>
> OR
>
> do we work so far as the tasks ask us to and potentially not have full
> reachability?
>
> Kind regards,
> Gavin
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
William McCall, CCIE #25044
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 06 2009 - 20:12:22 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:50:59 ART