Re: BB connectivity in Real Lab

Thank You Ryan

Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> You have so many other things to worry about during the lab. Unless it's a
> troubleshooting section, I wouldn't change any speed / duplex from
> auto/auto.
>
> For a troubleshooting section (4.0), I could see a 1 or 2 question
> involving a duplex setting. Like "After enabling a new 100M uplink, you
> customer is complaining of very slow download speeds." Then you might check
> to see if your side is hardcoded or not and make the appropriate changes.
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:15 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: BB connectivity in Real Lab
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was working through ospfv2 experience with the BB routers connectivity
> in the real lab.During that course ,one of the question arised to me
> is,during the real lab if the switchport(assuming it is connected to a
> switchport in the switch rather than directly connected to another router)
> connected to BB router negotaited to 10 mbps *half-duplex* by default*,*
> and
> layer 3 stuff like routing protocol updates,BGP peering(also getting
> upates) works fine and even ping to the BB router ip address works without
> any drop,In that case,is it recommended to attempt to make it as
> full-duplex
> or leave as it is.In real life ,normally we make it as full-duplex to
> avoid
> collisions/drop packets but assuming its CCIE lab do we have to look into
> this perspective.
>
> Kindly let me know your suggestion and thoughts.
>
> Thanks for the great assistance
>
> Regards
> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Sep 25 2009 - 08:28:13 ART