Re: Spamming the list

You mentioned darby now he will come. He was quiet so far.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> In this case it was not me that advertised CCNP, but hey its cool, but how
> else would some one know that these guys are now selling CCNA and/or CCNP
> stuff, besides, in his previous post he attacked Darby and whole bunch of
> other people, my point is if people think that this list is going down, or
> they think the quality is NO longer there, and its crap, well...... there
> is
> an option, GET OUT. Now you can agree or disagree, but if i dont like a
> forum, i will NOT be there.
>
> *I can't help but feel that the frequency of quality contributions has
> decreased over the
> past 6 - 12 months.*
>
> Remember you got your CCIE in the last 6 - 12 months, and i saw most of
> your
> questions answered by the members of this forum, now how did the frequency
> of quality contribution decrease?
>
> This forum has helped many people, Vendors like IPexpert, INE have helped
> lots of people, i may disagree with all of their philosophy but the truth
> of
> the matter is that they have, and if they advertise a product from time to
> time, it should NOT boil anyones blood.
> I travel 10 + countries and let me tell you, no matter where i go, people
> login and know GS, they love the stuff that we say, they learn a lot from
> this forum. NO ONE believes that the quality is NOT there, no one.
>
> I guess i better go back to work, MPLS-TE can be a pain.
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Narbik,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks, but if this character is NOT happy, he/she should get the hell
> > out.
> > > Who is he to tell Wayne or Brians or whom ever else to stop posting
> crap?
> >
> > I disagree.
> >
> > The list rules are the list rules, and they're clear as day. You could
> > argue that it's not up to Chaz to try to enforce them (not that I
> > discourage it -- I'm "guilty" of it myself).
> >
> > > Has anyone seen anything but CRAP from this character? Mate these are
> the
> > > guys that make CCIEs every day, what have you made lately? Who have you
> > > helped lately?
> >
> > No one is complaining about the presence of people like yourself and
> > other instructors on the list. The list would be significantly
> > de-valued without you all. Having said that, I can't help but feel
> > that the frequency of quality contributions has decreased over the
> > past 6 - 12 months. I don't know if it's because prospective
> > candidates are in hibernation, waiting for information about the 4.0
> > lab to materialise, or if it's because of the North American summer
> > :-)
> >
> > I personally don't mind seeing the occasional product announcement on
> > this list. I'm not really interested in subscribing to 10+ different
> > RSS feeds or blogs to stay up-to-date. I'm blissfully ignorant of what
> > commercial interests the list owner has, and why he may have decided
> > to create the rules as they currently exist, but I reckon as long as
> > the frequency of such posts is "reasonable", and the subject is
> > prefixed so that it's clearly commercial in nature, it can work.
> >
> > In summary, I think the real problem is that the list rules around
> > commercial posts don't align with what the majority of the subscribers
> > are willing to accept.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Dale
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> www.MicronicsTraining.com <http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
> Sr. Technical Instructor
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Sep 24 2009 - 13:56:06 ART