Hi Jack,
I think the best way here is to set up a topology and do 2 tests on this...
- First configure OSPF on the topo
- Second configure ISIS on the topo
Verify the differences in terms of CPU load and try to look at the
timers / routing table guess this will be the same ...
-- Regards, Iwan Hoogendoorn CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP) Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:49 AM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all , > > I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to > migrate to IS-IS. > I was planning to runnn dual IGP , as ospf with AD 110 and ISIS with AD 115 > , OSPF will always be preffered. > > I was planning the challenges for migration, below are the ones which I > could think of , please give your inputs on WHAT CONSIDERATIONS TO KEEP IN > MIND BEFORE MIGRATION. > Also request you to share some docs for migration of OSPF to ISIS<<<<< > > 1) MEMORY/CPU utilisation > 2) no. of routes in routing table and database > 3) harware of the cisco devices ( 7206/12K) > > Regards > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Sep 23 2009 - 11:30:09 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:04 ART