Re: migration of ospf to ISIS

From: Iwan Hoogendoorn <iwan_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:30:09 +0200

Hi Jack,

I think the best way here is to set up a topology and do 2 tests on this...
- First configure OSPF on the topo
- Second configure ISIS on the topo

Verify the differences in terms of CPU load and try to look at the
timers / routing table guess this will be the same ...

-- 
Regards,
Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:49 AM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all ,
>
> I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to
> migrate to IS-IS.
> I was planning to runnn dual IGP , as ospf with AD 110 and ISIS with AD 115
> , OSPF will always be preffered.
>
> I was planning the challenges for migration, below are the ones which I
> could think of , please give your inputs on WHAT CONSIDERATIONS TO KEEP IN
> MIND BEFORE MIGRATION.
> Also request you to share some docs for migration of OSPF to ISIS<<<<<
>
> 1)  MEMORY/CPU utilisation
> 2)  no. of routes in routing table and database
> 3)  harware of the cisco devices ( 7206/12K)
>
> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Sep 23 2009 - 11:30:09 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:04 ART