Re: Interface vlan x and manually create vlan x

From: Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:00:26 -0400

Already mentioned, but probably not a good idea to change modes unless
asked. Client and transparent modes only would never be a requirement
IMO.

Sent from handheld.

On Sep 13, 2009, at 7:54 AM, "ospfv2" <ospfv2_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> many thanks Rafi
>
> one more question, if the lab only give you transparent vtp or
> client vtp mode
>
> and i set one of the switches as server to propagate the vlan, so all
> the switches now have the same vlans, is there any danger of doing
> this ?
>
> TIA
>
>
>
> On 9/13/09, Nadeem Rafi <nrafia_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> if you just create interface vlan x and no vlan x is being created,
>> then
>> interface vlan x status will be down down. For interface vlan x, an
>> associated vlan should exist.
>> HTH
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:52 PM, ospfv2 <ospfv2_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Expert
>>>
>>> another quick-dumb question :)
>>>
>>> when the lab ask to create interface vlan x,
>>> should we create the vlan x manually as well ?
>>> i mean will that cause me loosing point ?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
 

> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Sep 13 2009 - 11:00:26 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:03 ART