Re: Inter-AS MPLS VPN

From: Jo Knight <joknight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:39:25 +0300

Vignesh,

The ASBR will reject the routes that are reflected down from R1 as the
default behaviour is to reject VPNv4 routes that it does not have a VRF
instance for - this is called Automatic Route Filtering.

There is no need for the ASBR to know about these routes, but if you wanted
them to show on the ASBR try adding this command to your BGP config.

no bgp default route-target filter

Jo

2009/9/11 Vignesh Sethuraman <sethuvignesh_at_gmail.com>

> Hello Experts,
>
> In Option 3 (10C): Multi-Hop MP-eBGP Between RR and eBGP Between ASBRs -
> Inter-AS MPLS VPN, the routes are not learned by ASBR. This is an expected
> behavior. But I could not understand the reason.
>
> In my scenario R2 is the PE which redistribute the route 200.0.0.4/32 into
> VPNV4 table, R1 is the RR which receives VPNV4 route from R2 and R5 is ASBR
> connected to other AS which is not receiving the route from RR. Though it
> is
> an expected behavior, Could someone explain the reason.
> *
> R2#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all | inc 200.0.0.4
> *> 200.0.0.4/32 150.50.24.1 1 32768
>
> R2#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all labels | inc 200.0.0.4
> 200.0.0.4/32 150.50.24.1 19/nolabel
>
> R1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all | inc 200.0.0.4
> *>i200.0.0.4/32 200.0.0.2 1 100 0 ?
>
> R1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all labels | inc 200.0.0.4
> 200.0.0.4/32 200.0.0.2 nolabel/19
>
> R5#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
>
> R5#
>
> Thanks,
> Vignesh
>
>
> *
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Sep 11 2009 - 18:39:25 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:03 ART