We need to wait around 4-12 weeks to get our results (at least that's what
the final screen told me unless I have bad eye sight). And the new thing
that I noticed since I last took a Cisco exam is that now you are required
to have your picture taken which will appear on the report given to you by
the test centre and a digital signature.
I tend to agree with most of Scott's points of view. I would be carbon
copying most of what he has said so I will save the trouble and agony that I
will cause to you GS people if I were to talk again about it.
I would though say that there's a fair bit of MPLS in it (no ... don't ask
me what kind of questions. That will break the NDA) and I would say that
troubleshooting reared its hard. I got to give it to Cisco. Those questions
some of them challenging and a small amount of it pretty simple if you read
ENOUGH. I never knew troubleshooting could be so much fun :-)
In the end, do I think I pass? I don't know. Either because of nervousness
or plain stupidity that I even managed to skip (by accident, I pressed the
next button too fast) two BIG questions where one of them had a few
sub-questions under them. If I fail, I'll just resit the written at a much
later time but one thing's for sure. After so much hesitation in answering a
number of questions yesterday, it shows that I am NOT YET ready for the lab.
Back to the basics for me and back to strengthening my foundation.
-- Warmest regards, Nickelby Thane Personal Blog : http://nthane.blogspot.com CCIE Blog : http://cciecisco.blogspot.com On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Scott M Vermillion < scott_ccie_list_at_it-ag.com> wrote: > Hey Brad, > > No, no score on the spot, as they've yet to decide which questions are > valid for scoring purposes and which are not (that whole "throw out the ones > that everybody got wrong and also all the ones that everybody got right and > keep the midsection for the production exam" type of philosophy). I think > it said "up to 12 weeks by mail" before I could expect my score but that > extreme seems unlikely given that they plan to go live with v4.0 in just > over a month. In any case, my gut instinct is that it's not a score I'll > want to toss out at cocktail parties. ;~) I only studied over the weekend > leading up to the exam and, being the last major summer holiday in the US, I > can't honestly say that I was completely sans adult beverages throughout the > whole ordeal (the studying part I mean of course)! > > Regards, > > Scott > > > > On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:15 , Brad Ellis wrote: > > Scott, >> >> Did you get your grade at the end of the exam? From the betas I recall >> taking in the past, you had to wait 6-8 weeks to get a score. >> >> I'd really like to see a hardcore simulator as part of the CCIE RS >> written instead of all multiple choice. Maybe using that pretty CCDE >> flash tool would be pretty slick as well. >> >> thanks, >> Brad Ellis >> CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) >> CCSI# 30482 >> CEO / President >> CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP) >> Email: brad_at_ccbootcamp.com >> Toll Free: 877-654-2243 >> International: +1-702-968-5100 >> Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call >> FAX: +1-702-446-8012 >> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! >> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >> Scott M Vermillion >> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:39 PM >> To: Nickelby Thane >> Cc: Marko Milivojevic; GS CCIE-Lab >> Subject: Re: CCIE R&S Written v4.0 beta >> >> Hey Nickelby, >> >> What was your perception? I sat this exam yesterday and have many >> thoughts (some of which I can share, some of which I cannot)... >> >> Since I was ineligible to recertify, passing and/or scoring highly was >> not a paramount objective. Fortunately or unfortunately depending on >> perspective, having no pass/fail consequences freed me to deeply >> ponder and comment on some questions I felt were in need of further >> development. This ultimately led to my having a significant swath of >> the exam to go with only about 30 minutes left on the clock, which in >> turn forced me to answer many questions without even having fully >> reading them; get a sense of the issue at hand and answer >> instinctively before clicking "Next" (the obvious answer choice is >> often the wrong one with this sort of test, though, so such an >> approach is suspect at best). I ultimately answered my final question >> with 40 seconds left to go, so not much chance I scored well at all >> but I'm hopeful that my comments will be considered and will help to >> improve the final product. >> >> I will say that emphasis has been lessened in some areas and increased >> in others, but this was not the big shift I was anticipating. Many >> questions were very familiar to me from previous bouts with the >> written. Those that were new were a mixed bag in my view. Some >> directly tested knowledge, whereas some seemed to be probing me for >> the "Most Correct Cisco Answer," since on a technical plane they could >> be answered variously, depending on perspective and interpretation of >> the question. That some of these might survive the beta and go into >> production perplexes me to say the least - for the money that's paid >> for the privilege of attempting this exam, my expectation is that all >> questions be of the highest quality and that they directly and >> singularly test knowledge and ability. Not having seen the new v4.0 >> Cert Guide yet, I'm not clear as to how some of the more obscure >> topics will be addressed there. Frankly, some questions seemed to >> have been borrowed directly from other exams/tracks, which I don't >> view positively at all. >> >> This was my first experience with a Cisco beta at any level or within >> any track. I received the same question or essentially the same >> question three times - twice. So either I earned or lost a lot of >> points on just a few topics, depending on whether or not my answers >> were the Most Cisco Correct (I resisted the urge to answer differently >> each time in an attempt to nullify the outcome one way or the other - >> I stuck to my guns). I was also surprised to see so many obvious >> typos in the questions and answer choices - one would expect a basic >> spell-checking before even going beta. But no real impact to the >> candidate there, so I'm not going to blow that sort of thing out of >> proportion. It is after all a $50 beta vs. a $350 production sitting. >> >> At the end of the day I can only sit back and hope things are >> tightened up a fair bit before I become eligible to actually recertify >> in a handful of months (and no doubt they will be - to exactly what >> extent is the burning question in my mind). I also object strongly to >> some of the new changes that Cisco claims were meant to bring the exam >> into alignment with others (e.g. no ability to skip questions and >> return to them later, time permitting). The CCIE was the original >> certification program, no? Bring the others into alignment with _it_ >> if there's an overwhelming imperative to do so. This exam is >> challenging and includes a time management element that is lacking in >> many of the others. I truly wish Cisco would stop trying to make the >> CCIE look and feel so much like the lower certs, yet have it be so >> much more of a challenge to obtain. All things aren't equal, OK? Or, >> as was once said, some things are more equal than others! >> >> Well there you have it from my own personal perspective anyway. No >> doubt the list would appreciate hearing from others in a strictly NDA- >> friendly sort of way... >> >> Regards, >> >> Scott >> >> >> On Sep 6, 2009, at 5:21 , Nickelby Thane wrote: >> >> I am giving it a go at this Sep 9 :-). If I fail, I am going to >>> blame it on >>> not knowing the technology enough :-). I expect Cisco to throw in a >>> few >>> L3VPN and MPLS questions and then fail us so we can resit the test >>> in its >>> final glory form (kidding). >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Warmest regards, >>> Nickelby Thane >>> Personal Blog : http://nthane.blogspot.com >>> CCIE Blog : http://cciecisco.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Marko Milivojevic >>> <markom_at_markom.info>wrote: >>> >>> So, have any of you guys tried the new beta? Anything, >>>> non-NDA-breaking, to report to the rest of us? :-) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marko >>>> CCIE #18427 (SP) >>>> My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/ >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >> >>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>> >>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________ >> >>> Subscription information may be found at: >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>> >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Sep 10 2009 - 08:32:53 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:03 ART