Re: Failed Again!!!

From: Thameem Maranveetil Parambath <security.goodie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:39:54 +0400

Hi Dennis,

Eventhough its tough to accept the failure , please dont give up! As Narbik
said you may be as good as a CCIE and not all CCIEs can be as good as you!

I am sure OEQ is a big WALL that we need to get through.. TDuring my second
attempt , i had just 3 months prepared ONLY for OEQ , reading the boring DOC
CD and going through Jeoff Doyle once more!

It give more insight when you read again these tech articles, but real
patience is erquired especially if you have crossed 28..For me my wife and
kid suffers due to my CCIE prep..And when you say to them its for their
goodness, they may not accept such long term preps!

What I think of my failure is that i took it in a positive way , telling
myself its good to learn MPLS and SP track! So now I have dual targets!
Already learnt RS and new version of RS which covers many items in SP..

Best Regards
Thameem

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Dennis Worth <dennis.worth_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> FYI Group
> Failed CCIE R&S for the 4th time, and this time it was because of the
> OEQ's.
> I am so glad Cisco wants to stop the cheaters out there, but after 5 years
> on and off of going through this stuff to pass this lab, failing on 1
> simple
> question that is not EXACTLY what they are asking for is absolutely out of
> control.
>
> I will be back, but to all who take this lab exam, you might as well chalk
> it up to LUCK more than skill or knowledge. I hate what this exam has come
> to. It really has no relevance to anything with those questions.
>
> Best of LUCK to anyone who takes the lab, because you will need it!
>
> --
> Dennis Worth
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Sep 09 2009 - 08:39:54 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:03 ART