Re: Petition: Revamp or Replace OEQ

From: Darby Weaver <darby.weaver_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:15:04 -0400

I don't think so.

I was reading the NMC-Tech Library to see if anything like some of the Q,
I've seen are in there and I really thought they would be.

Hint: The Tech-Library is essentially CCIERS-1 and nearly verbatim of the
NMC-1 and ECP-1 classes in the past.

Now I've got to review the other materials for the other questions I've been
curious about.

Let's face it due to the nature of the OEQ they are going to be obscure
sometimes.

Now I can say that the majority of Q's that I've been presented with seem to
be doable and probably have been in one form or other.

It's just an awful lot to get 1 of these Obscure types... and then get
something you can't remember exactly...

If I were an Employer - I'd not pay for this gamble.

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Dennis Worth <dennis.worth_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Just Curious! Does the 360 program teach you how to pass the OEQ's? Does
> anyone know for sure, or is it just something you you should have come
> across and memorized during your studies?
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:04 AM, William McCall <william.mccall_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Dark Fiber <darkfiber08_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Just to push people who are upset to the side and call them whiners
> isn't
> > > really necessary. People have a right to be upset about something if
> they
> > > feel slighted. No offense I was there at live and took the 8 hour
> lecture
> > > and 8 hour lab for the R&S. They were really forth coming about
> > anything...
> > >
> > >
> > Being upset is one thing. Going on about how its unfair and wah wah is
> > hardly worth the point of a group study. People who drive for success
> want
> > to find a way to success, not just complain about how they didn't get
> > theirs.
> >
> >
> > > People should have the option to express their views on something, if
> you
> > > don't like it don't read the thread wah wah...
> > >
> >
> > Similarly, the option is present for those who disagree. If someone
> doesn't
> > like the response, then they can still disagree. Its a two way street.
> >
> >
> > > And no I haven't taken my lab yet so I haven't passed/failed to to be
> > > slighted in the least.
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > William McCall, CCIE #25044
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dennis Worth
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Darby Weaver
Network Engineer
407-802-7394
darbyweaver_at_yahoo.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Sep 05 2009 - 14:15:04 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:02 ART