Hi Mohammed,
Thanks for the comment and can you please elaborate about the backward
compatibility .
Thank you
Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Mohamed El Henawy <m.henawy_at_link.net> wrote:
> for backward computability ...anyway I think they wouldn't ask to configure
> it if its Rapid
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mohamed El Henawy" <m.henawy_at_link.net>
> To: "Anantha Subramanian Natarajan" <anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com>;
> "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 2:52 PM
> Subject: Re: STP Timer values on the secondary bridge
>
>
>
> I think if this is Rapid SPT we need to modify it on all Switches....Right
>> or Wrong ??
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anantha Subramanian Natarajan" <
>> anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com>
>> To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 4:07 AM
>> Subject: STP Timer values on the secondary bridge
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I was going through spanning tree protocol and here by referencing the
>>> below paragraph read
>>>
>>> "You can only modify the timer values from the root bridge.Modifying the
>>> values on other bridges has no effect.However,don't forget to update any
>>> "backup" root bridges "
>>>
>>> My question is ,if for example in the real lab they give a task to
>>> configure
>>> SW1 has primary root for vlan x and SW2 has secondary root for Vlan x and
>>> then in another task,if they ask to change the forward-delay timer value
>>> to
>>> y seconds for Vlan x,do we have to configure this on both root primary
>>> and
>>> secondary switch.I heard many times that we don't neeed to worry about
>>> redundancy unless specifically asked in the lab.But just want to make
>>> sure,if they ask the above task,can we just configure the timer value on
>>> the
>>> root primary and not on the secondary.
>>>
>>> Kindly clarify the same.Thanks for the help
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.76/2345 - Release Date: 09/04/09
>> 05:51:00
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.76/2345 - Release Date: 09/04/09
> 05:51:00
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Sep 05 2009 - 10:14:43 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:02 ART