Re: STP Timer values on the secondary bridge

From: Mohamed El Henawy <m.henawy_at_link.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:10:06 +0300

for backward computability ...anyway I think they wouldn't ask to configure
it if its Rapid

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mohamed El Henawy" <m.henawy_at_link.net>
To: "Anantha Subramanian Natarajan" <anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com>;
"Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: STP Timer values on the secondary bridge

>I think if this is Rapid SPT we need to modify it on all Switches....Right
> or Wrong ??
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anantha Subramanian Natarajan" <anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com>
> To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 4:07 AM
> Subject: STP Timer values on the secondary bridge
>
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was going through spanning tree protocol and here by referencing the
>> below paragraph read
>>
>> "You can only modify the timer values from the root bridge.Modifying the
>> values on other bridges has no effect.However,don't forget to update any
>> "backup" root bridges "
>>
>> My question is ,if for example in the real lab they give a task to
>> configure
>> SW1 has primary root for vlan x and SW2 has secondary root for Vlan x and
>> then in another task,if they ask to change the forward-delay timer value
>> to
>> y seconds for Vlan x,do we have to configure this on both root primary
>> and
>> secondary switch.I heard many times that we don't neeed to worry about
>> redundancy unless specifically asked in the lab.But just want to make
>> sure,if they ask the above task,can we just configure the timer value on
>> the
>> root primary and not on the secondary.
>>
>> Kindly clarify the same.Thanks for the help
>>
>> Regards
>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.76/2345 - Release Date: 09/04/09
> 05:51:00
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.76/2345 - Release Date: 09/04/09
05:51:00

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Sep 05 2009 - 15:10:06 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:02 ART