Re: Failed Again!!!

The OEQ's were just a ban-aid they said at Cisco Live. Maybe they will come
off for 4.0 after some time... They are like winning the lottery though. I
got to see the first 40 out of 100 they used at Cisco Live and some were so
obscure it was just mind boggling. Why they feel the need to put in the
stuff they do I will never know. Why they don't ask theory question of the
core stuff that you are studying for the lab is anyone's guess. If you are
just trying to catch the brain dumpers in China ask any question of the LSA
types and they will have it wrong...

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Andy Mueller <andymueller713_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> You are right Ron, I should not. I am just frustrated. It's getting close
> to
> test time and I like others are not feeling too good right now.
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:10 AM, <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I understand your concerns but should you be taking out your cisco
> > frustrations out on your customers?
> >
> > Two unrelated topics...I hope!! :)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Mueller <andymueller713_at_gmail.com>
> >
> > Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:03:56
> > To: Darby Weaver<darby.weaver_at_gmail.com>
> > Cc: Mark Matters<markccie_at_gmail.com>; Divin Mathew John<
> > divinjohn_at_gmail.com>; Dennis Worth<dennis.worth_at_gmail.com>; <
> > ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com><ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > Subject: Re: Failed Again!!!
> >
> >
> > Stops cheating? I believe Cisco is the one cheating people with these
> > questions. This is really turning into a huge problem.
> > I am testing in 2 weeks and don't have much hope of getting past the
> > questions, otherwise I believe the only lab problem I will have is time
> > management.
> > Cisco needs to think about who they are screwing. Consultants who
> recommend
> > hardware (like me) may be more "open ended" about whose products we
> > recommend. I am fed up with hearing about good engineers losing out
> because
> > of this.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Darby Weaver <darby.weaver_at_gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Well then we'd be back to the Written before too long.
> > >
> > > However, make them questions that most candidates actually cover in
> their
> > > studies.
> > >
> > > That would be great.
> > >
> > > Hint: If a person uses google and no references ever come up... It's
> > > probably a bit too arcane.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Mark Matters <markccie_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Make them multiple choice.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Darby Weaver
> > > Network Engineer
> > >
> > > 407-802-7394
> > > darbyweaver_at_yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Sep 04 2009 - 09:29:55 ART