Static mroutes are not the only way to resolve rpf failures. What else do
you we have in our toolbelt :-)
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Danshtr <danshtr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I asked the proctor. He told me they are not allowed. He might be wrong. At
> the end I have found another solution.
>
> Best regards,
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Martin Hogan <martin.john.hogan_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If you were in a lab situation and were given the rule that you aren't
> > allowed to use static routes, yet you had an RPF issue which you could
> > easiest resolve with ip mroute blah, would you consider that breaching
> the
> > rule? Why? Why not?
> >
> > This is prompted by me doing IGP manipulation in order to resolve,
> where-as
> > the solution guide just did the ip mroute.
> >
> > Apologies if this has been covered extensively in the past and im
> rehashing
> > it however I was unable to find it in the archive. Hopefully im better at
> > browsing the Cisco docs :)
> >
> > Cheers for the thoughts.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Fri Sep 04 2009 - 06:13:02 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:02 ART