Please explain, I think I don't get it ;-)
-- Regards, Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Tony Varriale <tvarriale_at_flamboyaninc.com>wrote: > Some people get it and some don't. Some people never will. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 31, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Rick Mur <rmur_at_ipexpert.com> wrote: > > Does the Nexus 7k support FCoE or fibre channel? >> The 7k is nothing more than a big 10G switch. >> >> The 5k is a totally different story and I definitely see the use of that >> one. This is a fantastic switch, bringing 2 worlds together as it should be, >> reducing cabling and introducing an entire new generation of switches and >> network designs. >> >> As for Cisco TrustSec, great feature, but you have to replace your entire >> network you use it, still it's an evolvement of network designs. I kind of >> miss the spanning-tree enhancements? Do you mean multi-chassis etherchannels >> to create a loop-free topology? This is something that is an awesome >> technique, this is where Juniper lacks, but it's in the pipeline. >> >> I personally think the Nexus product line is placed too tight, it can only >> be used for a single purpose on one place in the network, but I still see >> all the advantages and I would love seeing it evolve and become mature. >> >> (btw. Juniper EX4200 vs Cat 3750E, the Juniper is a lot cheaper when you >> use 10G uplinks in a LAN design) >> >> P.S. It doesn't hurt to be critical right? ;-) No offense! I always prefer >> Cisco, but sometimes it's good to take a step back and see all from a >> different perspective. >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Rick Mur >> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) >> Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >> >> On 31 aug 2009, at 17:43, Mike Kraus (mikraus) wrote: >> >> What about FCoE? The Juniper EX series is good for customers wanting >>> high performance/cost using yesterday's design, which incurs multiple >>> chassis (Ethernet & fibre channel), additional cabling/power costs, and >>> a strict top of rack or end of row design (where reality requires both >>> in data centers today). >>> >>> If you are looking at the Nexus series as a big 10G switch, you're >>> missing the point of the Nexus product line. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >>> Rick Mur >>> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 3:23 AM >>> To: Tony Varriale >>> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com >>> Subject: Re: Nexus in DC? >>> >>> I know you can enable 'performance mode' so the linecard shuts down 24 >>> ports of the linecard. >>> Why can't the EX compete to the Nexus? The performance is quite the same >>> if not better as the Nexus line and totally owns the Cat6500 in terms of >>> performance. Still the Cat wins it on service modules and the vast >>> amount of line cards. >>> And btw. the EX8200 already has 320Gbps backplane connection for all >>> linecards while the Nexus gets support for 230Gbps linecards end of the >>> year and I don't even want to know when they start thinking of 500Gbps >>> to finally offer true non-blocking 32-port 10Gbps linecards :-) The only >>> thing the EX8200 lacks is support for some sort of multi-chassis >>> etherchannel, this is on the roadmap to be released soon though. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Rick Mur >>> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) >>> Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. >>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Tony Varriale >>> <tvarriale_at_flamboyaninc.com>wrote: >>> >>> Ok.you didn't say anything about the n7k in your message. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The n7k 10gig card can be "non-blocking".even thought that isn't the >>>> correct terminology. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Also, the v2 cards are coming out next year which will address the 10g >>>> >>> >>> card oversub issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The EX series doesn't really compete with the Nexus line. It's more >>>> of a competitor to the 6500s/ME6500s. When the new Cisco Sup comes >>>> out it will match the 10gig per slot capabilities. The EX is more of >>>> just straight 10GE enterprise or SP. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> tv >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Rick Mur [mailto:rmur_at_ipexpert.com] >>>> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 5:46 PM >>>> To: Tony Varriale >>>> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com >>>> Subject: Re: Nexus in DC? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The Nexus 7k. Of the 32-port 10GE linecard, you can only use 8 >>>> specifically marked ports if you want the full non-blocking 10GE due >>>> to the backplane connection. End 2009 they will release a linecard >>>> with 230Gbps backplane connection, so that should give a little better >>>> >>> port-density vs. >>> >>>> performance. Also the Cat6500 is oversubscribed as it also has a >>>> 40Gbps backplane connection and you can buy 8-port 10GE linecards and >>>> 48-port 1GE ones. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So I really like the non-blocking idea of the Juniper EX8200, great >>>> selling point :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Rick Mur >>>> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) >>>> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Tony Varriale < >>>> tvarriale_at_flamboyaninc.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Which Cisco product are you referring to that is oversubbed? >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 30, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Rick Mur <rmur_at_ipexpert.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I will be installing the first UCS chassis' in the Netherlands within >>>> the next month, of course with the UCS6k (Tweaked Nexus 5k). I also >>>> implemented one of the first Nexus 5k's in NL last March :-) So yes >>>> cool stuff! Still needs some time to get mature in terms of hardware >>>> and software. >>>> Juniper actually has a better DC switch with their EX8200 (totally >>>> non-blocking), much cheaper for the same amount of bandwidth (not port >>>> >>> >>> density, but the Juniper is NOT oversubscribed). >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Rick Mur >>>> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) >>>> Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. >>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Ronald Johns <rj686b_at_att.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> We're doing Nexus as well. In fact, we're likely ordering everything >>>> tomorrow. Keep in mind, there's a limit to 12 FEX's to a 5000 >>>> cluster, or at least that's what they tell me. They screwed up our >>>> first quote because our SE didn't look into this... >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf >>>> Of Omkar Tambalkar >>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 5:12 PM >>>> To: Cisco certification >>>> Subject: Re: Nexus in DC? >>>> >>>> We are also rolling out the NX 7010 and 5020 in the next couple of >>>> months as part of our datacenter network upgrade. I am planning to use >>>> >>> >>> vPCs from the 5020 to 7010 but as we are using 2 VDCs there will be >>>> vPC for each VDC translating to 4 10g coming out of each 5020. I am >>>> sure we will have to get a extra 32 port 10g card with 8 ports >>>> dedicated for line speed for these cross connects. Not to mention you >>>> need 1 keep-alive and 1 cross-connect for each VDC. >>>> It seems that the 7010 can do lot of service aggregation using the >>>> ACE, WAAS modules but we just want to consolidate our aggregation >>>> switches in to single set of chasiss. >>>> On top of that in a few months time, we have provide active-active >>>> datacenter functionality with a set of NX 7010 at each datacenter so >>>> that traffic can be load balanced. >>>> And the training was a 4-day Firefly course...which was fairly basic >>>> in terms of depth and breadth of material covered Fun times....... >>>> >>>> -Omkar Tambalkar >>>> CCIE #24892 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Tony Varriale >>>> <tvarriale_at_flamboyaninc.com>wrote: >>>> >>>> Yup. >>>> >>>> If this is your first experience with any of those platforms I >>>> guarantee you are going to run into something not so pleasant. >>>> >>>> tv >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf >>>> Of Marc La Porte >>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:27 AM >>>> To: Cisco certification >>>> Subject: Nexus in DC? >>>> >>>> Hey guys, >>>> >>>> Any of you already having practical experience with big Nexus >>>> roll-outs >>>> >>>> in >>>> >>>> Data Centers? Running into any "problems"? >>>> >>>> For a customer we are planning to deploy 5020 end-of-row switches with >>>> >>> >>> 2148T top-of-rack switches, aggregated in 7018s fully loaded with >>>> 32-port >>>> >>>> 10-Gbps >>>> >>>> blades. Just to give you an idea, the complete data center would be >>>> >>>> around >>>> >>>> 256 rows (30,000 ports)... >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Marc >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>> > > _ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>> > > _ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>> > > _ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>> > > _ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>> > > _ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>> > > _ >>>> Subscription information may be found >>>> at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>> > > _ Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>> >>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>> >> > > Subscription information may be found at: >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>> >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> > > > Subscription information may be found at:http://www.groupstudy.com/ >> list/CCIELab.html >> > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Sep 01 2009 - 04:49:23 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:57 ART