I will be installing the first UCS chassis' in the Netherlands within the
next month, of course with the UCS6k (Tweaked Nexus 5k). I also implemented
one of the first Nexus 5k's in NL last March :-)
So yes cool stuff! Still needs some time to get mature in terms of hardware
and software.
Juniper actually has a better DC switch with their EX8200 (totally
non-blocking), much cheaper for the same amount of bandwidth (not port
density, but the Juniper is NOT oversubscribed).
-- Regards, Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Ronald Johns <rj686b_at_att.com> wrote: > We're doing Nexus as well. In fact, we're likely ordering everything > tomorrow. Keep in mind, there's a limit to 12 FEX's to a 5000 cluster, or > at least that's what they tell me. They screwed up our first quote because > our SE didn't look into this... > > -----Original Message----- > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > Omkar Tambalkar > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 5:12 PM > To: Cisco certification > Subject: Re: Nexus in DC? > > We are also rolling out the NX 7010 and 5020 in the next couple of months > as > part of our datacenter network upgrade. I am planning to use vPCs from the > 5020 to 7010 but as we are using 2 VDCs there will be vPC for each VDC > translating to 4 10g coming out of each 5020. I am sure we will have to get > a extra 32 port 10g card with 8 ports dedicated for line speed for these > cross connects. Not to mention you need 1 keep-alive and 1 cross-connect > for > each VDC. > It seems that the 7010 can do lot of service aggregation using the ACE, > WAAS > modules but we just want to consolidate our aggregation switches in to > single set of chasiss. > On top of that in a few months time, we have provide active-active > datacenter functionality with a set of NX 7010 at each datacenter so that > traffic can be load balanced. > And the training was a 4-day Firefly course...which was fairly basic in > terms of depth and breadth of material covered > Fun times....... > > -Omkar Tambalkar > CCIE #24892 > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Tony Varriale > <tvarriale_at_flamboyaninc.com>wrote: > > > Yup. > > > > If this is your first experience with any of those platforms I guarantee > > you > > are going to run into something not so pleasant. > > > > tv > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > > Marc > > La Porte > > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:27 AM > > To: Cisco certification > > Subject: Nexus in DC? > > > > Hey guys, > > > > Any of you already having practical experience with big Nexus roll-outs > in > > Data Centers? Running into any "problems"? > > > > For a customer we are planning to deploy 5020 end-of-row switches with > > 2148T > > top-of-rack switches, aggregated in 7018s fully loaded with 32-port > 10-Gbps > > blades. Just to give you an idea, the complete data center would be > around > > 256 rows (30,000 ports)... > > > > Cheers, > > Marc > > > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Aug 31 2009 - 00:09:19 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:57 ART