Re: Lo0 in EIGRP and OSPF

Please keep in mind that some labs require FULL reach-ability at the end of
a particular section. The loopbacks are definitely part of that
requirement!
If it's not told to be advertised I would do a 'redistribute connected' with
a route-map specifying all interfaces that are missing from any routing
protocol.

Same counts for links to a backbone router where you only connect with
through EBGP, would that be part of your topology and therefore falling
within the requirement? That would be a question for the proctor as it
depends on the questioning and the requirement.

--
Regards,
Rick Mur
CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> Sameer,
>
> It will be clear what you need to advertise and how. I wouldn't worry about
> it.
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Sameer Khurana <sam.futureccie_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > I would like to know... if the question doesn't specify for some tasks in
> > the lab to advertise Loopback0 in EIGRP or OSPF so is it recommended to
> > configure it or not?
> >
> > Also, how about point-to-point on loopback0... if its not asked?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > -Sameer
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net