Re: Conditional Advertise

Hi S Malik,

  Thanks for confirming the same.

Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:50 AM, S Malik <ccie.09_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Natraajan,
> you are correct, ACL & Prefix-list under same clause don't go together.
> Please see following link quoting example and I wrongly understood AND/OR
> logic from there,
>
>
>
http://books.google.com/books?id=-SM1Jeu07UYC&pg=RA1-PA273&lpg=RA1-PA273&dq=r
oute-map+logical+AND&source=bl&ots=w8TcsNnJHf&sig=jvVGIhjeOBFS6njdfBjFzn4cnyY
&hl=en&ei=fDGZSs_kAcuf8Qau8uSfBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#v=one
page&q=route-map%20logical%20AND&f=false
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
> anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> If I understand properly from you ,I tried that,it give an error
>> mentioning u can't use the prefix-list and access-list on the same
route-map
>> sequence as below
>>
>> *"% prefix-list and access-list can not co-exist in one route-map
>> sequence"*
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Regards
>> Anantha Subramanian Natraajan
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If they're the same TYPE (e.g. two ACLs) then the router will redo things
>>> for you onto the same line, making the logic an OR. Kind of obnoxious if
>>> you ask me. :)
>>>
>>> But if you do two DIFFERENT things (e.g. one prefix list and one ACL) you
>>> can have the AND logic working.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Scott Morris*, CCIE*x4* (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>>>
>>> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>>>
>>> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>>>
>>> evil_at_ine.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>>
>>> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>>>
>>> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>>>
>>> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>>>
>>>
>>> Knowledge is power.
>>>
>>> Power corrupts.
>>>
>>> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> S Malik wrote:
>>>
>>> One thing is sure that same line is O, when we assign two ACL under one
>>> clause, it is shown in one line and treated as OR.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
<anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Sugar Can,
>>>
>>> Can you try inside the route-map as below
>>>
>>> Match ip address prefix-list <prefix-list1><prefix-list2>
>>>
>>> I think whenever we specify the match criteria on same line ,it is an AND
>>> operation
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Sagar Rane <sagar.ccie_at_gmail.com>
<sagar.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I have requirement where, bgp should check its bgp routing table for two
>>> routes eq (10.1.1.0/24 and 20.2.2.2/32) and only if both routes are
>>> present,
>>> it should originate a route advertisement of 192.168.10.0/24.
>>>
>>> I have tried advertise-map and exist map, but how can we used exist-map
>>>
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>
>>> check both the routes at the same time?
>>>
>>> Anyway how we can meet this requirement please let me know.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sagar
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found
at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found
at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Aug 29 2009 - 09:04:30 ART