Re: Conditional Advertise

Natraajan,
you are correct, ACL & Prefix-list under same clause don't go together.
Please see following link quoting example and I wrongly understood AND/OR
logic from there,

http://books.google.com/books?id=-SM1Jeu07UYC&pg=RA1-PA273&lpg=RA1-PA273&dq=r
oute-map+logical+AND&source=bl&ots=w8TcsNnJHf&sig=jvVGIhjeOBFS6njdfBjFzn4cnyY
&hl=en&ei=fDGZSs_kAcuf8Qau8uSfBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#v=one
page&q=route-map%20logical%20AND&f=false

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:

> Hi Scott,
>
> If I understand properly from you ,I tried that,it give an error
> mentioning u can't use the prefix-list and access-list on the same
route-map
> sequence as below
>
> *"% prefix-list and access-list can not co-exist in one route-map
> sequence"*
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Anantha Subramanian Natraajan
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:
>
>> If they're the same TYPE (e.g. two ACLs) then the router will redo things
>> for you onto the same line, making the logic an OR. Kind of obnoxious if
>> you ask me. :)
>>
>> But if you do two DIFFERENT things (e.g. one prefix list and one ACL) you
>> can have the AND logic working.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Scott Morris*, CCIE*x4* (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>>
>> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>>
>> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>>
>> evil_at_ine.com
>>
>>
>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>
>> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>>
>> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>>
>> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>>
>>
>> Knowledge is power.
>>
>> Power corrupts.
>>
>> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> S Malik wrote:
>>
>> One thing is sure that same line is O, when we assign two ACL under one
>> clause, it is shown in one line and treated as OR.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
<anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Sugar Can,
>>
>> Can you try inside the route-map as below
>>
>> Match ip address prefix-list <prefix-list1><prefix-list2>
>>
>> I think whenever we specify the match criteria on same line ,it is an AND
>> operation
>>
>> Regards
>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Sagar Rane <sagar.ccie_at_gmail.com>
<sagar.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have requirement where, bgp should check its bgp routing table for two
>> routes eq (10.1.1.0/24 and 20.2.2.2/32) and only if both routes are
>> present,
>> it should originate a route advertisement of 192.168.10.0/24.
>>
>> I have tried advertise-map and exist map, but how can we used exist-map
>>
>>
>> to
>>
>>
>> check both the routes at the same time?
>>
>> Anyway how we can meet this requirement please let me know.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sagar
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found
at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found
at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Aug 29 2009 - 09:50:44 ART