Re: Strange status of EtherChannel!

From: Federico Cossu <federico.cossu_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:59:34 +0200

i don't know and i can't verify now, but
i would say that the other end of the link for port 23 is not configured in
"mode on".

/R

2009/8/27 But Nicky <lyredhair_at_gmail.com>

> Dear all,
>
> SW2(config)#do sh eth summ
> Flags: D - down P - in port-channel
> I - stand-alone s - suspended
> H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
> R - Layer3 S - Layer2
> U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregato
> U - unsuitable for bundling
> W - waiting to be aggregated
> D - default port
> Number of channel-groups in use: 1
> Number of aggregators: 1
> Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
>
>
------+-------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------

---
>
> 12      Po12(SU)          -         Fa0/19(P) Fa0/20(P) Fa0/21(P) Fa0/22(P)
>                                           Fa0/23() Fa0/24(P) Fa0/25P)
> Fa0/26(P)
>
>
> Each interface are shown as (P), except F0/23 (),What is the status of
> F0/23? I have not saw it before, please help.
>
> Many thanks,
> But Nguyen.
>
> P/S: This is question for OEQ, which I collected from internet, do not
> require posting the configuration.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Faeddare pagu, sabidorla meda.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Aug 27 2009 - 21:59:34 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:57 ART