Re: Auto RP with sparse-mode and no dm-fallback..and its

From: Mohamed El Henawy <m.henawy_at_link.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:25:55 +0300

Hello Roy ,

yes i configured both to use the loopback 10.10.10.10

here is the config

> R1-----LAN-----R0-----FR------R2
> R1
> FastEthernet0/0 1.1.1.1 YES manual up up
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip pim sparse-mode
> ip igmp join-group 224.11.11.11
> duplex auto
> speed auto
>
> R0
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> ip pim sparse-mode
>
> end
>
> R0#sh run int s1/0
> ip address 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.0
> ip pim sparse-mode
> encapsulation frame-relay
> serial restart-delay 0
> frame-relay map ip 2.2.2.2 101 broadcast
> end
>
> R0#
>
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.0
> ip pim sparse-mode
> end
>
> ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 10 group-list 10
> ip pim send-rp-discovery Loopback0 scope 10
>
> R0#sh access-lists 10
> Standard IP access list 10
> 10 permit 224.11.11.11
> R0#
>
> R2#
> !
> interface Serial1/0
> ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
> ip pim sparse-mode
> encapsulation frame-relay
> serial restart-delay 0
> frame-relay map ip 2.2.2.1 202 broadcast
>
> ip route 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.1
>
>
> before this route was aded i get
>
> *Mar 1 00:16:39.427: IP(0): s=10.10.10.10 (Serial1/0) d=224.0.1.40
> id=166, ttl=9, prot=17, len=52(48), RPF lookup failed for source
>
>
>
> then i correct it and after that i noticed this debug on R2
>
> RP 10.10.10.10
> *Mar 1 00:19:35.375: MRT(0): Update (*,224.0.1.40), RPF /0.0.0.0
> *Mar 1 00:19:35.375: MRT(0): Update Serial1/0/224.0.1.40 in the olist of
> (*, 224.0.1.40), Forward state - MAC built
> *Mar 1 00:19:37.051: MRT(0): Update (*,224.0.1.39), RPF /0.0.0.0
> *Mar 1 00:19:37.051: MRT(0): Update Serial1/0/224.0.1.39 in the olist of
> (*, 224.0.1.39), Forward state - MAC not built
> *Mar 1 00:19:38.527: IP(0): s=10.10.10.10 (Serial1/0) d=224.0.1.40
> id=229, ttl=9, prot=17, len=52(48), mroute olist null
> *Mar 1 00:19:38.531: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-discovery, from 10.10.10.10,
> RP_cnt 1, ht 181
> *Mar 1 00:19:38.531: Auto-RP(0): Update (224.11.11.11/32,
> RP:10.10.10.10), PIMv2 v1(?), v2v1 ===========================>
> Info source: 10.10.10.10 (?), elected via Auto-RP
> Uptime: 00:00:54, expires: 00:02:02
> R2#
>
> R2#sh ip pim rp map
> PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
>
> Group(s) 224.11.11.11/32
> RP 10.10.10.10
>
> Without any pings from R2 to this group there is maping ...Auto RP sent
> the update via maping agent R0 to R2
>
>
>

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Roy Waterman
  To: Mohamed El Henawy
  Cc: Mark Matters ; Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com ; G2 ; Cisco certification ;
nobody_at_groupstudy.com
  Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:50 AM
  Subject: Re: Auto RP with sparse-mode and no dm-fallback..and its working

  Hi Mohammed

  Looks like RP = mapping agent = 10.

  *Mar 1 00:36:16.159: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-discovery, from 10.10.10.10,
<-- received from mapping agent
  RP_cnt 1, ht 181

  Have you configured both ip pim send rp announce & send rp discovery on
10.10.10.10?
  You should expect to see the mappings on your routers as they start
automatically listening to 224.0.1.40 as soon as u configured pim...

  As Keegan mentioned, please post the configs...

  Regards
  Roy

  2009/8/26 Mohamed El Henawy <m.henawy_at_link.net>

    What i dont understand is how come we are enabling only sparse and yet we
can
    see the maping on all the routers...why use BSR then

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.69/2328 - Release Date: 08/26/09
12:16:00

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Aug 27 2009 - 11:25:55 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:57 ART